Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Science topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates science curriculum adoption; pilot data, teacher buy-in and $30,000 startup cost discussed
Summary
Board members pressed for more teacher feedback and outcome data before adopting new K–8 science materials; Dr. Schultz said an opening-year startup cost of about $30,000 is expected for teacher manuals and lab equipment.
Board members asked for additional teacher feedback and outcome data before finalizing a proposed K–8 science curriculum adoption, while district staff said the recommended materials would require a one‑time startup purchase estimated at about $30,000.
A board member said she had earlier requested more time and data after the education committee and that she wanted teacher input on why a piloted program was not being used before moving to adoption. “I didn't think we were at the point where all the information was available, to make that decision tonight,” the board member said, asking for more teacher feedback, cost details and evidence of improved student achievement.
Dr. Schultz, who answered detailed questions about the pilots and program options, said the district piloted several science resources and that, with the district realignment to a middle school structure, a different program mix would fit instructional time better. “The opening year start up cost is around $30,000. That's because a lot of the teacher manuals need to be purchased upfront. A lot of the lab equipment needs to be purchased upfront,” Dr. Schultz said, adding that many startup costs would decline in subsequent years.
Dr. Schultz told the board the district reviewed OpenSciED (purchased with Carolina teacher guides and bulk lab kits) and Mystery Science as candidates. He said OpenSciED with Carolina guides offers complete teacher guides and bundled lab equipment, while Mystery Science was judged highly engaging and better suited in some middle‑grade schedules. He also noted that statewide assessment changes (the new science assessment piloted this year) limit the availability of direct outcome data tied to those new standards.
Board members raised concerns about why Mystery Science had not been used consistently in prior years and whether teachers had been equipped with the necessary lab resources. Dr. Schultz said scheduling and building configuration affected past use and that the district trimmed optional student workbooks to preserve the curriculum’s investigative “mystery” structure.
Next steps: Board members said they would seek teacher feedback, cost breakdowns and pilot results at a future education committee meeting before taking a final adoption vote.
