Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Childcare Military topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs exemption allowing DoD‑certified family childcare to operate without duplicative state license for military families
Summary
SB 99 would allow family childcare providers already certified by the U.S. Department of Defense to be exempt from California licensure when serving only military families, while preserving state health and safety standards and inspection authority.
Sen. Blakesford presented SB 99, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense, to allow family childcare (FCC) providers who hold DoD certification to operate in California without securing a separate state license when they care exclusively for military families. The bill conditions the exemption on compliance with California anti‑discrimination laws and state health and safety standards and preserves authority for the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to inspect and enforce rules.
Veronica Badillo, representing Navy Region Southwest and the DoD liaison office, told the committee the DOD certification process includes background checks, monthly inspections and unannounced visits and is “recognized as one of the most stringent in the country.” She and the author said the duplicate state licensure process can delay providers from opening and discourage military spouses, who make up a large share of DoD‑certified FCC providers, from operating in California when frequent relocation is expected.
The DoD witness cited inspection timing differences — monthly inspections within the DoD program versus the state’s three‑year inspection cycle for licensed FCCs — and said the DOD program follows providers across states, reducing time spent on verifying employment history. Supporters argued SB 99 would increase available childcare capacity for military families, reduce wait lists for on‑base care and support local providers’ financial stability.
The committee received one letter of concerns from a childcare organization (filed), and one public speaker (an advocate) offered brief support. Committee members acknowledged amendments proposed by the author to address concerns and recommended the bill be referred to the Senate Military & Veterans Affairs Committee (as amended). The committee’s clerk recorded the committee vote as unanimous among members present (5–0) to advance the bill as amended.
SB 99 maintains that CDSS retains inspection and enforcement authority and requires agreement between the DoD and CDSS to set the policy governing the exemption. Several members thanked the author for working with the committee on amendments before referral.
The committee’s recommendation is a policy referral; the bill’s fiscal and programmatic implementation details (for example, statewide notification and enforcement procedures) would be the subject of follow‑up work between CDSS, the author and DoD partners.
