Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board of Regents approves consent agenda after roll call; several members signal dissent or abstention on specific consent items

3111940 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to approve the consent agenda at the April 24 Iowa Board of Regents meeting passed after a roll call vote; members recorded objections or abstentions on specific items before the roll call.

A motion to approve the consent agenda at the April 24 Iowa Board of Regents meeting passed after a roll call vote. The motion was made by Regent Dunkel and seconded by Regent Rouse; the board announced affirmative responses during the roll call and the chair declared the motion approved.

The consent agenda vote drew several recorded exceptions. Regent Barker said she would vote no on the Memorial Union renovation project and on a University of Iowa reimbursement resolution and said she would abstain from the agenda item listed as item J, the proposed resident system rates; she said she would vote yes on the remaining consent items. Earlier, Regent Hensley asked that it be noted she would “pass on the collective bargaining vote,” which is part of the consent agenda. The board proceeded with the roll call and the chair announced the motion approved.

Motion and vote details were read into the record: the motion to approve and receive the consent items was made by Regent Dunkel and seconded by Regent Rouse. During the roll call the following members were recorded on the public transcript as responding in the affirmative: Regent Reiswick, Regent Dunkel, Regent Lindemeyer, Regent Rouse, Regent Gipple, Regent Kramer and Regent Bates. The chair then stated the motion was approved.

The meeting record shows members voiced their positions on specific consent agenda components before the roll call; Barker’s comments enumerated three explicit votes (two no votes and one abstention on a separate consent item). Hensley’s earlier statement asking to be noted as “passing on the collective bargaining vote” was entered on the public transcript prior to the roll call.

No additional formal amendments to the consent agenda were recorded on the transcript between the motion and the roll call. The board moved on to other business after the chair declared the consent agenda approved.