Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council committee weighs enforcing attendance rules for boards and commissions; clerk reports outreach resolves most cases
Summary
The Government Operations Committee discussed code provisions and administrative practice for addressing chronic absences from city boards and commissions. Council staff said the clerk contacts absentees and that outreach resolves most cases; code currently authorizes removal only by council action.
The Government Operations Committee discussed options for enforcing attendance requirements for city boards and commissions and asked staff and the clerk’s office how unexcused absences are handled.
Pamela Nichols, council management analyst, said the clerk’s office regularly contacts members identified as not attending meetings and that in her experience roughly 85 percent of cases are resolved by outreach and voluntary resignation when appropriate. Nichols noted that the city code authorizes the council to remove members for negligence of duty, but that removal requires a council resolution and a formal vote, which makes the process administratively lengthy.
Committee members asked whether bylaws or administrative rules already empower boards to address attendance and whether council could consider code changes to allow an expedited process in cases where the administration has not filled vacancies in a timely way. Council members also discussed whether meeting times and scheduling practices should be standardized or better coordinated with prospective members to reduce avoidable attendance problems.
Next steps
Staff said they will continue outreach to boards and commissions to ensure attendance tracking is consistent, and the clerk’s office will continue its practice of contacting absent members and requesting resignations when appropriate. Committee members requested additional options analysis, including whether council should retain authority to remove members or consider alternative remedies, and whether council should create a timeline or mechanism to appoint members when administrative appointments are delayed.
Why it matters
Councils and citizen advisory boards rely on quorum to conduct business. Committee members said clarifying and streamlining the process for addressing chronic nonattendance would help boards remain effective and reduce the need for repeated rescheduling or prolonged vacancies.
