Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Clark County ethics panel declines to investigate complaint over C Tran board vote
Summary
The Clark County Ethics Commission voted unanimously that a complaint alleging procedural and Open Meetings Act violations over a Clark County Council vote to replace a C Tran board member did not rise to an ethics violation; the commission also approved updates to its business process and will allow remote testimony at an upcoming hearing.
The Clark County Ethics Commission voted unanimously that allegations in complaint 2025-03 do not constitute an ethics violation, and approved procedural changes and a plan to allow remote testimony at an upcoming hearing.
At a virtual meeting where no members of the public spoke, Adam Murray, chair of the Clark County Ethics Commission, said the complaint filed by Rob Anderson challenged procedures used by members of the Clark County Council when they voted to remove councilor Michelle Belcott from the C Tran board and replace her with councilor Fuentes. Murray said the commission's role at this stage is to decide whether the complaint alleges facts that could reasonably show a violation of the county ethics code.
"Mister Anderson's complaint does not allege misuse of a public position for personal gain," Murray said, adding that state law provides remedies for alleged Open…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
