Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge review of agricultural zoning and developer commitments; cite habitat loss in new subdivisions
Summary
Two residents used the council's public-comment period to press Dorchester County for stricter enforcement of agricultural zoning criteria and to ask the council to hold developers accountable for amenities and tree preservation promised in development agreements.
Two residents used Dorchester County Council’s public-comment period on April 21 to raise separate concerns about agricultural-zoning qualifications and habitat loss in new developments.
Arlene Wheeler told council she had reviewed recent development transactions and argued that properties held by publicly traded developers should not qualify for agricultural zoning under state law. Wheeler cited South Carolina statutes and said recent changes to rollback-tax rules (reducing the lookback period from five years to three) advantage developers; she urged county officials to check assessor practices when classifying land. Wheeler identified several builders by name in her remarks and said county application forms did not ask certain ownership questions she believes are material to agricultural-use determinations.
John Tolomey of the Ponds subdivision said he and other homeowners are losing tree cover and trails that were marketed to buyers. "These beautiful live oaks ... are gone, folks," Tolomey said. He urged the council to press Coulter (the developer referenced in public remarks) to meet commitments made in development agreements, including trails and a pool, and criticized clearing practices that he said destroy habitat and mature trees.
Council members acknowledged the concerns. Chairman David Chinis told Tolomey the only development agreement currently in force is the 2023 agreement and said no amendments were before council. Administration staff offered to follow up on zoning, assessor and development-agreement questions raised during public comments.
