Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission motion to resume prior maintenance-facility plan fails for lack of second
Summary
A motion to revert to the commission's earlier plan for the county maintenance facility and proceed without an architect failed April 21 for lack of a second; the county attorney advised compliance with state statute requiring an architect or engineer for county projects above the statutory threshold.
A proposal to resume an earlier plan for the county maintenance facility and proceed without an architect failed for lack of a second during the Cheatham County Commission meeting April 21.
A commissioner moved that the commission "start back where we were two years ago" on the maintenance building and proceed with construction without formally retaining an architect as the county had previously considered. The motion did not receive a second and therefore failed. Commissioners then discussed statutory requirements and building-safety concerns.
The county attorney advised the commission to follow state law, noting that state statute requires an architect or engineer for public building projects above a statutory threshold. The transcript record indicates the threshold was described as having been increased from $25,000 to $50,000; the attorney said any county project over $50,000 would require an architect under state statute. Commissioners weighed the risk of proceeding without required design professionals and raised concerns about potential state fire-marshals' requirements and long-term costs if a building did not meet state standards.
No vote was taken on a plan to move forward without design professionals; the motion failed due to lack of a second and discussion concluded with agreement to follow statutory requirements.
