Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: settlements, contracts and routine approvals from City Council
Summary
A quick roundup of formal roll-call votes taken at the Los Angeles City Council meeting, including two closed-session settlements and approvals of several reported items and contract extensions.
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Los Angeles City Council took a series of formal votes on routine approvals, a contract extension and closed-session settlements during the meeting.
Key votes
- Settlement: Leon Pointer v. City of Los Angeles — approved for $350,000. (Closed session item 33b.) Roll call: 11 ayes.
- Settlement: Operating Industries, Incorporated partial consent decree — approved for $316,597. (Closed session item 33c.) Roll call: 11 ayes.
- Item 3: Confirmation of building safety assessment in Council District 1 — motion to approve the report moved by Mister Reyes; roll call recorded 10 ayes and the item was approved.
- Contract extension (interim rubbish/waste removal; DWP-related cleanup file): Council approved a short contract extension to cover three months of continued service while a competitively-bid contract is finalized. Department staff indicated an approximate monthly cost of $30,000 (figure described as approximate). Roll call: 10 ayes.
Other procedural votes included approval of multiple grouped agenda items (items 4–19, with some items held or continued by request) and motions to continue or hold certain items until specified dates on the calendar. Where the transcript provided no mover or specific tally beyond a roll call figure, the article lists the recorded outcome as stated by the clerk.
Details and notes
- The two closed-session settlements were announced on the council floor after the closed session concluded; both were approved by roll call (11 ayes) and the clerk recorded the amounts stated above.
- The interim rubbish-removal contract extension was described in committee discussion as a short-term continuation because the apparent low bidder for the imminent contract had documentation or insurance issues; staff said the extension was to “hold us over” until competitive-bid contract award and close out the file.
- Item 3 (building safety assessment) was described by council staff as part of an ongoing identification of problematic properties in northeast neighborhoods; Councilmember Reyes moved approval and the clerk recorded 10 ayes.
If additional details (movers, seconds, or full vote records by member) were not recorded in the public transcript, those fields are recorded here as “not specified.”

