Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Shelter Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission forwards animal shelter budget that includes proposal for a county veterinarian
Summary
The Maury County Commission forwarded the animal shelter budget, which proposes creating an in-house veterinarian position to replace weekly contract services and expand surgical capacity.
Kim, the shelter's lead (identified in the meeting as the shelter presenter), asked the commission to forward the animal shelter budget, which includes a proposal to convert contract veterinary services into a full-time county veterinarian position. The shelter's budget increase was presented as 16% including the new position; staff said they would reallocate the current contract line and one medical position to offset part of the cost.
Kim told commissioners the shelter currently has one contracted veterinarian who comes once a week and that demand has grown. "We are at a point where we have so many animals that we need surgery more than just once a week," Kim said, later adding the shelter is averaging "30 to 40 animals per week on a surgery list." She also noted that the contracted veterinarian holds the DEA license used to order vaccines and medications; making the vet an employee would ensure continuity of medicine procurement and reduce operational risk if the contractor stopped providing services.
Commissioners discussed pay, recruiting and potential revenue offsets. Kim described the proposed veterinarian classification as grade 15 and cited pay-band ranges discussed in the meeting: a top-of-first-quartile figure of $86,920 and a maximum at $112,761. Commissioners and shelter staff noted the budget includes $55,000 for contract veterinary services that would be removed if the county hires an on-staff veterinarian; removing that contract line was described as reducing the net budget increase roughly from 16% to about 9% (figures provided during the meeting were estimated and depend on benefits selections).
Commissioner Howard and others urged the shelter to continue seeking increased contributions from the City of Columbia; Kim said the shelter presented numbers to the shelter board, which "support us" but had not committed to an increased payment. Commissioners discussed potential public services revenue (low-cost spay/neuter, microchip clinics, euthanasia services for the public) and the prospect of charging lower fees than private clinics to keep animals in homes.
Commissioner Grooms moved to forward the animal shelter budget and a second was recorded; the motion carried on a voice vote with no roll-call tally recorded. The forwarded budget will advance to the county's capital and revenue discussions as part of the ongoing budget cycle.
