Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Branding Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gilroy staff seeks logo-use policy; council signals written permission and standards with possible grandfathering
Summary
Staff presented options for a city logo policy after finding local groups using the city’s Spice of Life mark. Councilmembers directed staff to require written permission, require compliance with style standards and consider grandfathering existing users who come into compliance.
City staff on April 21 asked the council for policy direction after finding local organizations using elements of the City of Gilroy seal and the “Spice of Life” logo in their branding.
Staff presentation and rationale
Staff said the city seal (reserved for official documents under the city charter) and the Spice of Life logo (used by the city for promotional communications, social media and events) have been adopted in a style guide and that outside use of those marks can cause public confusion about endorsements or affiliations. Staff showed examples: a downtown business association and Gilroy Gardens use versions of the city’s “G” or garlic bulb mark in their branding; Leadership Gilroy’s use included an unauthorized color change. Staff said a local policy would strengthen the city’s legal position if misuse occurs and would clarify approved uses for external organizations.
Council discussion and direction
Councilmembers discussed tradeoffs between protecting the city mark and allowing community partners to use a recognizable local brand. Several councilmembers said they value the community and economic benefits that groups such as Gilroy Gardens and downtown business organizations provide. At the end of discussion staff reported council direction to prepare a local logo policy that:
- Requires written permission for outside use of the city logo or seal; - Requires outside users to comply with the city’s style-guide standards for color, spacing and proportions; and - Allows existing users to be grandfathered provided they update their usage to meet the city’s style and color standards within a reasonable transition timeline.
Public comment and next steps
A public commenter asked that grassroots nonprofit organizations be considered when staff drafts permission criteria. Staff said it would return with a draft policy for council consideration that includes enforcement mechanisms and reasonable timelines for rebranding for any entities asked to change their marks.
No formal ordinance or resolution was introduced at the meeting; staff returned to draft a proposed policy consistent with council direction.
