Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regionalization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Middle Country outlines selective participation in NYSED regionalization initiative
Summary
Assistant Superintendent Jonathan Singer told the Board of Education the district will join the inaugural group of 27 districts developing Part 1 projects after completing review and agreeing to limited commitments; participation remains optional and subject to local evaluation.
Get email alerts on the Regionalization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assistant Superintendent Jonathan Singer updated the Board of Education on Middle Country Central School District's engagement with the New York State Education Department's Regionalization Initiative, saying the district has chosen targeted, voluntary participation rather than broad enrollment in the program.
Singer told trustees the initiative, announced to superintendents in a Sept. 12, 2024 letter, was initially met with skepticism but that the state later clarified districts could opt out and could select which projects to pursue. He said Middle Country completed a strengths-and-needs survey, attended convenings hosted by Eastern Suffolk BOCES and will participate in the inaugural group of 27 districts developing Part 1 regionalization projects.
The decision matters because Part 1 projects represent concrete, collaborative commitments districts agree to implement now; Part 2 lists aspirational projects that would proceed only with additional resources or regulatory changes. "Middle Country will be part of the inaugural group of 27 districts developing the Part 1 regionalization projects," Singer said.
Singer said the district chose projects that align with existing work and the district mission and that participation is reversible: the district retains the option to discontinue any project if it does not reflect local values or deliver expected benefits. He said the district also plans its own evaluations of any project it joins to assess impact on students and staff.
The presentation cited local examples of cross-district work already underway, including an AP Seminar consortium and joint athletics partnerships. Singer said Part 2 projects remain selections only and will not move forward absent sufficient resources or regulatory changes.
There was no board vote on the presentation. Singer said the district will report back to the board as projects move from planning to implementation.

