Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Splashpad topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Southborough recreation commission advances Fayetteville Park splash-pad plan while CPC reviews funding
Summary
At a Recreation Commission meeting, staff reported positive technical feedback from the Community Preservation Committee (CPC) on a combined splash pad and dog‑park plan for Fayetteville Park. Commissioners discussed grant timelines, contingency and parking concerns and asked the design team to refine cost estimates before a town‑meeting vote.
Town of Southborough recreation staff told commissioners at their meeting that the Community Preservation Committee gave generally favorable technical feedback on a proposed splash pad and adjacent dog‑park at Fayetteville Park, but significant funding and permitting steps remain before construction can begin.
The project’s lead staff, Travis (recreation department staff), said the most substantial funding opportunity under consideration is a federal grant administered through the state Department of Conservation and Recreation. “It's a it's a it's a federal grant, through the through the state,” Travis said, adding that the application must be submitted to the state in early January and that applicants typically wait about 90 days for a state response. He said towns that recently received similar awards included Woburn (about $480,000) and Leominster (about $200,000), though he cautioned not every applicant is successful.
Commissioners said that timeline and the possibility of later federal approval mean the town cannot assume immediate funding. Kristen (Commissioner) summarized a CPC recommendation for the warrant article wording: the town would request the total project amount with contingency, and if a grant is later awarded the corresponding CPC funds would be returned to the CPC instead of being spent. “We would give that money back or we wouldn't spend the CPC money and instead that would come back to CPC for the amount equivalent to whatever the grant is,” she said, paraphrasing the committee’s approach.
Why this matters: the splash pad/dog‑park combination would increase accessible summer programming space for families while also creating management questions about parking, fencing and long‑term maintenance. Commissioners described the issue as a medium‑risk, multiyear capital project that requires coordination among the Recreation Department, the design consultant and CPC funding rules before it reaches Town Meeting for a binding appropriation.
Discussion highlights and next steps
- Grants and timeline: Travis explained the two‑stage approval risk — state review after submission (about 90 days) and then a separate federal approval step that can extend the overall schedule. He said the Recreation Department will continue seeking other grant opportunities tied to accessibility and will attend a DCR workshop on Nov. 17 for more details.
- CPC advice on warrant language: CPC members suggested asking for the full project amount (including a contingency) in the warrant article and committing to return CPC funds equal to any later grant award. The commission discussed whether a 20% contingency is appropriate; staff reported that 20% is consistent with current industry practice and with what other towns have used.
- Cost estimates and design work: commissioners asked the design team (referred to in the meeting as Activitas/ActivaTest in the materials) to revise the cost estimate to reflect the latest rendering and the removal of an initial parking‑lot line item. Staff said Activitas will update the estimate, targeting a meeting with the commission in November to review a refined budget and rendering.
- Parking and access: commissioners reiterated that parking is a major question for the site. They discussed on‑street spaces on Central Street, entry routing to reduce dog/splash‑pad conflicts and signage. Staff said they will count the actual marked spaces on Central Street to produce a baseline parking inventory.
- Dog park adjacency: staff noted examples of parks where splash pads and dog areas co‑exist (Chelsea, Watertown) and said those examples will be provided as design references.
- Maintenance and life‑cycle costs: commissioners asked about ongoing maintenance and component replacement schedules for splash‑pad systems; staff said these projects often require periodic component replacements rather than a single large rebuild, and the design consultant will include typical maintenance expectations in an updated estimate.
Votes at a glance
- Motion to approve the meeting minutes from Oct. 6: passed by roll call (Christine: yes; Don: yes; Rachel: yes; Kristen: yes). (Motion and second were made during the meeting; mover/second not specified by name in the transcript.)
- Motion to adjourn: passed by roll call (Christine: yes; Don: yes; Rachel: yes; Kristen: yes). (Motion and second were made during the meeting; mover/second not specified by name in the transcript.)
What’s next
Staff will share a project folder with CPC responses, deeds and renderings and will ask the design consultant to update cost estimates. Commissioners agreed to aim for an informational discussion with the design team in November once updated numbers are available. Any CPC request for a Town Meeting appropriation will still require a formal Town Meeting vote and (if successful) subsequent federal approvals for the grant portion of the project.
Ending
Commissioners set their next meeting for Nov. 10 and directed staff to continue refining the Fayetteville Park plans and funding materials for CPC review and potential Town Meeting consideration.
