Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fees And Mapping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kern LAFCO adopts fee schedule revisions; institutes hourly fees, deposits and map-review enforcement
Summary
The commission approved a revised fee schedule effective July 1, 2025, increasing some flat fees, adding hourly charges for repeated map/legal revisions, and authorizing staff discretion to require deposits for complex applications.
Kern LAFCO on April 16 approved a revised fee schedule intended to bring fees closer to the actual cost of proceedings, and directed staff to begin enforcing map and legal‑description standards by using hourly fees and deposits when applicants repeatedly submit deficient materials.
Executive Officer Bud Knox told commissioners staff had calculated an average cost of just over $13,000 per proceeding over the past five years — substantially higher than current fees, which account for only about 10%–15% of the commission’s annual budget. Knox said the proposed fee schedule would take effect July 1, 2025, and that staff sought better tools to handle repeatedly deficient maps and legal descriptions that require multiple rounds of staff and county surveyor review.
Staff and mapping reviewer Bud Rice described the recurring problem: applicants often correct only a subset of required redlines and return materials that still fail to meet county surveying and LAFCO standards, creating repeated staff work. Rice said staff will continue to make minor corrections, but when submissions require multiple rounds of substantive correction staff will either charge the published hourly rate or refer the work to an engineering/surveying firm and bill the applicant for those hours.
The adopted schedule raises the standard flat annexation application fee from $1,200 to $1,500 and formalizes an hourly review rate for additional staff or consultant time. Commissioners discussed setting a clear trigger; staff agreed to a working practice that after two substantive rounds of revisions the hourly rate may be billed or a deposit required. Commissioners also discussed tiered retainers keyed to project complexity (parcels or acreage).
A motion to adopt the fee schedule, including staff authority to require deposits and apply hourly charges for repeated or complex reviews, passed on a roll-call vote. Staff said final fee language and implementation details will be posted and applicants will be able to protest the fee schedule through the commission process if they choose.
