Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Toc Hollywood 19unit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PLUM upholds categorical exemption for 19‑unit TOC building in Hollywood; appeal denied
Summary
The PLUM Committee denied an appeal challenging a Class 32 categorical exemption and upheld the Planning Commission's approval of a 19‑unit Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) project that reserves two units for extremely low‑income households.
The Planning and Land Use Management Committee voted to deny an appeal challenging the Department of City Planning’s use of a Class 32 (infill) categorical exemption for a 19‑unit Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) project located in Council District 10.
Planning staff (Heather Plemmas) told the committee the project met the criteria for the Class 32 exemption because it is located in a fully developed, predominantly multifamily neighborhood with multifamily zoning and met TOC proximity requirements for tier qualification. The project reserves two units for extremely low‑income households and had been previously approved by the Planning Director and then heard on appeal by the City Planning Commission, which denied the appeal.
Appellant counsel Jamie Hall argued that the project failed to comply with objective existing zoning “queue” conditions adopted in 1992 for the neighborhood, raising specific assertions about private‑open‑space calculations, required dimensions for common usable open space, and required ground‑cover planting. Hall said a licensed architect’s analysis attached to the appeal finds portions of the project inconsistent with the ordinance and warned the city risks reversal in court if it approves the exemption despite noncompliance.
Applicant counsel Jackson McNeil and project representatives told the committee the Planning Commission had considered and rejected the appellant’s claims in a five‑zero decision and that, on matters such as bus line frequency and open‑space dimensions, the project complies or is conditioned to comply prior to building permits. McNeil said Metro confirmed the nearby NextGen line meets the “major bus route” frequency standard used for TOC tiering.
Committee members discussed the timeline for the project: application submittal (mid‑2023), Planning Director approval (May 8, 2024), Planning Commission appeal hearing (January 2025), and the PLUM decision (April 25, 2025). Several members expressed concern about the time it takes to move housing projects through appeals and signaled an interest in reducing delays.
After committee discussion the members recorded a unanimous vote to deny the appeal and sustain the Planning Director and Commission actions; the project will proceed under the conditions attached to the Planning Department report.
