Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floodplain Regulations Repeal Replace topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Findlay commission recommends replacing city flood-damage regulations to meet state and federal standards
Summary
The planning commission recommended that city council approve an ordinance to repeal and replace Findlay's flood damage reduction regulations with an Ohio Department of Natural Resources–aligned model to maintain National Flood Insurance Program eligibility.
The Findlay City Planning Commission on Oct. 9 recommended that city council proceed with repeal and replacement of the city's flood damage reduction regulations, a change the commission's presenter said was done in coordination with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and is intended to keep the city in compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program.
City staff presented a full repeal-and-replace draft of the floodplain management provisions. The draft incorporates the ODNR model code framework and includes some locally retained higher standards. The presenter said ODNR reviewed and approved the draft before it was brought to the commission.
"This update ensures that Findlay remains in compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program," a city staff presenter said, adding that NFIP compliance is necessary to maintain residents' eligibility for federally backed flood insurance, reduce long-term flood risk, and strengthen public safety. The presenter noted that required provisions of the ODNR model cannot be reduced and that any substantive local changes would have to be resubmitted to ODNR for review and approval.
Eric, identified in the meeting as the city floodplain administrator, told commissioners the update followed a community assessment visit that flagged the city's code as outdated. He said the city worked with ODNR over about two years to ensure local higher standards were preserved where possible and to adopt state updates that improved definitions and enforceability. "This will bring us into compliance," Eric said.
Commission members asked clarifying questions about definitions in the draft, including whether the definition of "building" was intended to cover shed-type structures and whether the floodway and flood-hazard boundary map language was adequate. The presenter said the state had removed some definitions from the model as unnecessary and confirmed that flood-plain and floodway definitions are addressed in the draft and in applicable state mapping.
The commission voted to recommend approval of the special review application (SR 01 20 25). The presenter said the next steps are review by the planning and zoning committee and then three readings before city council; staff projected the ordinance could be adopted and effective by Jan. 1, subject to council action.
No public opposition or formal public comment was recorded during the commission discussion. The commission's recommendation forwards the draft to council for final consideration and potential adoption.
