Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CRA backs expanded demolition grants, adds redevelopment track for larger parcels
Summary
City staff proposed and commissioners supported amending the CRA demolition assistance program to better incent redevelopment on larger parcels. The board asked staff to prepare a resolution formalizing a two-track structure with higher caps when a site plan for redevelopment is in place.
Get email alerts on the Demolition Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cape Coral, Fla. — The Community Redevelopment Agency on Sept. 10 directed staff to formalize changes to the CRA demolition assistance grant to address a perceived disadvantage for larger parcels and to better incentive redevelopment.
Sharon Woodbury, the city’s economic development manager, outlined a recommended two-track approach. For demolition-only projects, the proposal keeps 100% reimbursement for the first $50,000 of eligible costs and 50% reimbursement for costs above $50,000 but raises the overall cap on the grant to $100,000. For projects that present a site development plan indicating immediate redevelopment, the agency would move applicants to a redevelopment track offering 75% reimbursement of eligible demolition costs up to a $200,000 maximum.
Woodbury described the proposed disbursement schedule for the redevelopment track: the first half of a project’s grant would be reimbursed after demolition is complete and the applicant submits paid invoices and clearance documentation; the second half would be reimbursed after the project has proceeded to the first vertical inspection (meaning permitting review is complete and construction has commenced).
Commissioners sought clarifications on implementation details. Commissioner Gunter asked whether the grant applies per parcel and Woodbury responded that the staff recommendation would be to treat the cap per parcel regardless of the number of structures. Commissioner Kilrea suggested a clawback mechanism could be appropriate if redevelopment did not occur as proposed; staff said the program remains a reimbursement structure and they would continue to require paid invoices and inspections before dispersing funds.
Board members emphasized the agency’s guiding principle — to eliminate slum and blight while preferring projects that result in redevelopment. Commissioners asked staff to prepare an after-the-fact resolution codifying the two-track structure and the implementation details discussed, including per-parcel caps, the reimbursement schedule and the documentation required at each disbursement stage.
What’s next: Staff will bring a formal resolution back to the CRA establishing the dual-track demolition grant structure and clarifying per-parcel application rules, disbursement timing and review criteria. The board signaled consensus to move that item forward for an upcoming meeting.
No formal vote to adopt the amended program was recorded on Sept. 10; the board provided direction and sought an after-the-fact resolution.

