Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public health contract amendments added funds for tobacco prevention, opioid settlement work and safe drinking water testing
Summary
Crook County Health & Human Services presented a second amendment to its state contract with the Oregon Health Authority that adjusts funding for public‑health emergency preparedness, tobacco prevention, opioid settlement primary‑prevention dollars and safe‑drinking‑water support for public water systems.
Katie Palm, Crook County’s Health & Human Services director, presented a second amendment to the county’s state contract with the Oregon Health Authority at the Sept. 24 meeting. The amendment contains multiple fiscal adjustments and new or reallocated program funds.
Why it matters: The contract amendment revises funding for several important public‑health programs that the county administers: public‑health emergency preparedness (a temporary decrease that Palm said the county expects to recover in a future amendment), the Tobacco Prevention and Education Program, state‑level opioid settlement pass‑through funds for primary prevention, and $40,000 for safe drinking‑water work related to public water systems.
Palm described multiple tobacco‑prevention activities funded through the award: school partnerships (Students Against Destructive Decisions programs), community outreach, perinatal nicotine supports for pregnant and new families, pharmacy partnerships for nicotine‑replacement therapy and systemwide clinical referrals for cessation services. She said tobacco prevention remains one of the department’s better‑funded public‑health programs.
On the opioid settlement funds, Palm said the state board that directs settlement investments (OSPTR, per transcript) added primary prevention funding for local work. The safe‑drinking‑water dollars are intended to support work with public water systems (cities and water districts) to test and respond to system issues rather than individual private‑well testing.
Board members asked about possible federal funding impacts (for example, WIC or Medicaid) and whether cuts at the federal level would trickle down through the state to the county. Palm said the county had not yet seen local federal reductions but anticipated potential impacts in the coming fiscal year and that the state has also been making adjustments.
Outcome: Commissioners agreed the contract amendment could be placed on consent agenda for final action at a later meeting; no final vote was recorded at this presentation. Palm said she expects more contract amendments in the biennium as the state processes federal pass‑through funds and program adjustments.
Ending: Palm requested that commissioners place the amendment on the consent agenda for a forthcoming meeting and said she would provide additional details and memos as future amendments are processed.
