Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes And Closed Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fire Commission approves minutes, moves into closed session and votes not to disclose litigation discussion
Summary
The San Francisco Fire Commission approved minutes from its July 9 meeting, voted to convene a closed session on existing litigation and later voted not to disclose details of that closed-session discussion. The closed-session agenda referenced a proposed $75,000 payment in Kareem McKnight litigation.
San Francisco — At its July 23 meeting the San Francisco Fire Commission approved minutes from the July 9 regular meeting, voted to convene a closed session on existing litigation and then voted not to disclose the closed-session discussion.
Minutes approval
The commission considered approval of the minutes from the July 9, 2025 regular meeting. A motion to approve the minutes was made and seconded; President Marcy Frazier recorded her vote as “aye,” Commissioner Alan Lowe recorded “aye,” and Commissioner Armee Morgan recorded an abstention. The commission president announced the motion passed.
Closed session and nondisclosure
The commission then considered whether to conduct agenda item 7 in closed session (existing litigation and settlement discussions). The item’s staff notes identified the matter as Kareem McKnight v. City and County of San Francisco, U.S. District Court case number 22-CV-04600, and the staff text lists “City to pay $75,000 for dismissal of claims.” The commission voted to convene closed session and, after reconvening in open session, voted not to disclose details of that closed-session discussion. The nondisclosure vote invoked California Government Code and the San Francisco Administrative Code provisions cited on the agenda.
Votes at a glance (as recorded in the meeting transcript)
- Approve minutes (July 9, 2025): motion moved (unnamed), seconded by Commissioner Nakasho; President Marcy Frazier — yes; Commissioner Alan Lowe — yes; Commissioner Armee Morgan — abstain; one commissioner recused because they were not present. Outcome: motion passes.
- Vote to convene closed session (item 7): motion to hold closed session moved; roll-call votes recorded with a majority in favor. Outcome: closed session held.
- Vote on disclosure following closed session (item 7): motion “not to disclose” carried. The commission cited California Government Code Section 549.56.0.9 (and related subsections) and San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.1(d)(1) on the agenda; after reconvening the commission reported “no action to report” and then voted “not to disclose” pursuant to the administrative code.
Legal references shown on the agenda: California Government Code Sections cited for closed-session authority and San Francisco Administrative Code Sections 67.1(d)(1) and 67.12(b).
What the commission reported: After closed session the commission announced there was no action to report publicly and then voted not to disclose any or all discussion held in closed session.
