Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail District Excise Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cochise County supervisors vote to continue jail district until November excise-tax vote
Summary
After a public hearing, the Cochise County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 25-24, continuing the county's jail district until voters decide on an excise tax on Nov. 4. Supporters called the action a legal technicality following a settlement; opponents said the move is unconstitutional and demanded additional procedural steps.
The Cochise County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 5 voted 3-0 to adopt Resolution 25-24, ordering the continued establishment of the Cochise County Jail District pending voter approval of an excise tax in the Nov. 4 election.
County Administrator Miss Gilman opened the board's public hearing and described the action as a procedural step tied to earlier litigation and a prior tax election. "Today, we have the public hearing on to order the continued establishment of the Cochise County Jail District pursuant to ARS 48 4001," she said, adding that the board previously established the district in May 2023 and that subsequent legal settlement language left the district intact.
The vote came after more than an hour of public comment and follow-up board discussion. The nut of the board's argument was legal continuity: county legal counsel said the court's opinion and the settlement did not dissolve the district. "We are going back to the status quo before the litigation because the opinion of the court did not ever resolve it as a matter of factual finding or legal finding, nor did the settlement agreement that was entered into," said legal counsel Mister Craya.
Opponents at the hearing pressed constitutional and procedural objections. Multiple speakers cited provisions of the Arizona Constitution and state law and asked the board to halt or rewrite the measure. Public commenter Dan Lechants told supervisors, "Vote no on this resolution. It is unconstitutional and therefore in violation of the supreme law of Arizona." Several commenters also demanded certified copies of supervisors' Arizona bonds pursuant to Title 38.
Board members framed the action as limited in scope. Chairman Antinori said the continuation is a time-limited, legal measure so county operations tied to the existing district can continue until voters render a decision. "We had an election in May '23 that established a jail district... this motion is only to continue that until the November when the voters will decide whether or not that's all this resolution is," Antinori said.
Clerks and county staff confirmed that tax collection tied to the prior jail tax ceased at midnight on July 31. The resolution adopted Aug. 5 keeps the legal structure of the jail district in place through the Nov. 4 excise-tax election; if voters approve the tax, the continuance will be validated by that result. If voters reject the tax, the board did not adopt any action at this meeting to extend the tax beyond that point.
The discussion included repeated references to the potential need for additional procedural language or signature thresholds raised by several commenters, but the board did not amend Resolution 25-24 at the meeting. The motion passed 3-0.
Next steps: the board will note the Nov. 4 ballot as the decisive action point for the proposed excise tax; legal questions raised at the hearing may prompt future legal filings from members of the public, according to commenters.
