Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kosciusko County considers motions to approve two fund items
Summary
At a Kosciusko County meeting, members moved to approve two budget items: “fund 40 7 100, Location 0000” and fund 4900 (law enforcement data access), Location 0000; vote tallies were not recorded in the provided transcript.
Kosciusko County moved on two budget items during a meeting where members made motions to approve both a fund labeled in the record as “fund 40 7 100, Location 0000” and fund 4900, described as the law enforcement data access fund, Location 0000.
County business that included the law enforcement data access fund centered on budgeting only the revenue actually collected in that fund. A staff speaker explained, “This is the amount of the dollars that we receive from the outerlying, lease department so they have access to the same data that the sheriff's department does. So we can only budget what we take in in this fund, and that's what we take in as long as it's all paid in this is what we'll pay out of here and the remainder of that, contract will be paid out of the edit fund.”
On the first item — recorded in the transcript as “fund 40 7 100, Location 0000” — a motion “to approve it as presented with the twos, threes, and sixes” was made by Delan (role/title not specified) and seconded by Joe (role/title not specified). The record shows the chair asked, “All those in favor?” but the transcript excerpt does not include a recorded tally or a formal announcement of the outcome.
On the second item, described as fund 4900 (law enforcement data access), Location 0000, Rachel (role/title not specified) moved to approve and Kim (role/title not specified) seconded. The same procedure was followed: the chair asked for those in favor, but the provided transcript does not include a final vote count or an explicit statement that the motion passed or failed.
Aside from the two motions and the staff explanation about fund revenue and which fund will cover the remainder of the contract, the transcript includes brief closing remarks thanking an individual named Gary (role/title not specified).
The transcript excerpts do not identify specific dollar appropriations, formal vote tallies, ordinance numbers, or further conditions attached to the motions. The meeting record provided here therefore documents the motions, movers and seconders, and the staff explanation of the law enforcement data access fund’s revenue limitations, but does not provide formal outcomes or numeric vote details.
