Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater And Environmental topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After debate, Genola planners opt not to require water study for Veil Subdivision
Summary
Commissioners debated flood and runoff risk for a five-acre portion of the Veil Subdivision and voted not to require a separate hydrology/water report while asking applicants to show how runoff will be retained on lots.
GENOLA — The Genola Planning Commission on Aug. 7 considered whether to require a separate water- or hydrology-report for the Veil Subdivision and decided not to make the study mandatory for the current application.
The vote followed a substantive discussion among commissioners and staff about the subdivision’s topography, whether the parcel is mapped as a flood zone or wetland, and what information applicants already provide through percolation tests at the building-permit stage.
Why it matters: a required hydrology report would add time and cost to a subdivision applicant’s process; commissioners said the ordinance gives them discretion when a parcel is not recorded as a flood zone or wetland. Commissioners asked staff to provide maps and links for floodplain and wetland designations so the panel can better assess future cases.
What was discussed
Planning staff explained the code makes water/hydrology reports discretionary when a property is not designated a flood zone or wetland; the purpose of the report is to inform applicants and the city about groundwater, runoff paths and stormwater impacts to neighboring properties. One staff member told commissioners she had contacted a hydrologist who estimated about $2,500 for a site visit and report.
Commissioners noted that percolation tests (required for septic/permitting) will provide some of the same site-specific information later in the process. Several commissioners said the portion of the Veil parcel under review sits on a hill and that runoff, if anything, is more likely to flow off the parcel than to inundate the proposed lots; others urged caution for areas known to have shallow groundwater or prior flooding.
Motion and outcome
A motion that the commission should not require a separate hydrology/water report for the Veil Subdivision carried; the commission added a caveat that submittals must include clear information showing how stormwater and runoff will be retained on each lot.
Next steps
Staff (Nikki) will send commissioners links to relevant floodplain and wetland maps and will research the typical scope and credentialing for the hydrology reports discussed. The applicant was advised to be ready to show runoff-retention plans at the Development Review Committee (DRC) stage.
