Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Volunteers and fosters urge Nassau County to investigate shelter conditions; commissioners and staff pledge to work on improvements
Summary
More than a dozen volunteers, fosters and residents urged the Nassau County Board of County Commissioners to address staffing, heat, sanitation, medical care, volunteer dismissal and alleged retaliation at Nassau County Animal Services (NCAS). Speakers called for investigations, reinstatement of terminated volunteers and better oversight; county
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dozens of Nassau County residents, volunteers and animal fosters used the Aug. 25 public-comment period to press the Board of County Commissioners for action on conditions and management at Nassau County Animal Services (NCAS).
The speakers raised multiple allegations and requests: long-term understaffing and high turnover among kennel technicians; insufficient training and low wages for some shelter staff; animals left in kennels without regular exercise or enrichment; sanitation and pest issues; heat and ventilation concerns in the main kennel building; insufficient communication and rejected volunteer proposals for outreach and marketing; alleged retaliatory termination of a volunteer who raised concerns; and an allegation reported by a commenter that a shelter veterinary technician was arrested for coercing a minor (the commenter said this was reported on local television). Several speakers asked the board to investigate, reinstate a terminated volunteer and revive an oversight committee.
Why it matters Public commenters said the problems affect animal welfare and volunteer retention; volunteers also warned of legal and worker-safety risks related to excessive heat conditions for animals and staff. Commissioners and county staff said they take concerns seriously, outlined limits of an older facility and said a new shelter is in planning, while urging cooperation between volunteers and staff to improve conditions in the interim.
What speakers said - Kylie Ciampa (volunteer) described hands-on volunteer tasks and said volunteers often perform the work needed to keep animals healthy and promoted and said volunteers fear termination or retaliation if they speak publicly.
- Dana Ciampa (volunteer/resident) and Peggy Ciampa (volunteer) recounted routine volunteer duties, described kennel conditions they said they observed, and urged better management and more consistent leadership/communication.
- Mary Anne Levesque (volunteer) focused on extreme-heat risks in the main kennel building, citing the federal Animal Welfare Act as the standard she referenced for temperature limits and arguing that fans alone do not meet that requirement; she provided a handout with state workerscompensation research on heat-related workplace risks.
- Rebecca Ward (resident/foster) and Heather Lafont (foster) said they had documented alleged problems including understaffing, medical errors by underqualified staff, improper handling or disposal of deceased animals, and long-term pets not getting adequate rehabilitation and promotion. Ward asked the county to investigate and restore community trust.
- Lexus Harrison (volunteer) said she was terminated as a volunteer after reporting alleged neglect and said she had escalated concerns to the board with no response; she asked to be reinstated and for immediate implementation of oversight, staffing and whistleblower protections.
- Trinity Stotes (volunteer) said she had reported concerns about a staff member to shelter leadership and later said a shelter veterinary technician was arrested on allegations of coercing a minor; she said her report had not been acted on when she raised it earlier.
- Several volunteers described past volunteer marketing and outreach work that they said had been curtailed, including social-media and email lists that previously promoted long-term residents and showed high adoption and transfer numbers.
County response and commissioner remarks County Manager Pope and Chair Heltman addressed the meeting: they said the facility is more than 35 years old and was not designed as a no-kill shelter; staff and commissioners said a new shelter is planned but will take years and substantial funding. The chair said two animals referenced earlier had autopsy findings (one had cancer, the other had a blood disease) and said there was no evidence in meeting remarks that heat caused those deaths. Commissioners emphasized differing perspectives among residents: Commissioner Gray highlighted that the county shelter received a Best Friends no-kill recognition and cited recent adoption/transfer statistics (the figure cited by the commissioner: 1,698 adoptions and 478 reunions in the referenced period). Several commissioners asked volunteers to continue to cooperate with staff and to help clear animals into foster and adoption homes.
Requests and next steps cited by commenters Speakers requested the board to: reinstate volunteers who said they were terminated for reporting concerns; convene or revive an oversight committee to provide accountability and community input; hire or designate an adoption coordinator and boost outreach channels; improve pay and training for kennel staff; and conduct an independent investigation into the allegations raised.
Ending Commissioners acknowledged the concerns and described ongoing work toward a replacement shelter and staffing improvements; they urged volunteers and community groups to work constructively with staff while county officials said they would continue to address the issues raised.
