Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission renames one street segment "Shadestone Lane", Chair recuses from consent item
Summary
On Aug. 6 the Perris Planning Commission approved a street-naming request to rename one proposed street segment in a residential planned-development area to Shade Stone Lane (requested spelling) after Chair Hammond recused himself from the vote; the motion passed 4-0.
Get email alerts on the Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Perris Planning Commission approved a consent-calendar street-naming application (Street Naming Review 25-00001) on Aug. 6 after Chair Hammond recused himself from that item. Commissioners revised the proposed name for one segment described as Street A, selecting the variation "Shade Stone Lane." The motion passed 4-0 with Chair Hammond absent for that vote due to recusal.
Why it matters: Street naming establishes official addressing and wayfinding for future parcels in a planned single-family residential development overlay. The commission's action advances the project by finalizing a name for one of the new public streets that will appear on subdivision maps and addressing records.
Proceedings and vote The chair removed item 5(b) from the consent calendar to recuse himself, and the vice chair presided over the street-naming discussion. A motion to change the name of Street A to Shade Stone Lane was made and seconded; Commissioners Lopez, Jimenez, Menendez and Vice Chair Shively voted yes. Chair Hammond recused and did not participate in the vote.
Administrative notes The street-naming application covers nine streets associated with a single-family residential planned-development overlay near the northeast corner of Mountain Avenue and McPherson Road (Assessor's map not specified in the record). The commission recorded the 4-0 vote approving the name change for Street A and returned the meeting to the full consent calendar process.
"With a vote of 4 to 0, this motion is approved," the vice chair said after the roll call on the item.
No public speakers were recorded on the topic during the consent-calendar item.

