Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Civilian Advisory Board topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate permanent civilian advisory board for DeKalb police; resolution deferred 30 days for more detail
Summary
A proposed resolution to establish a standing community advisory board for the DeKalb County Police Department drew discussion about purpose, role and CALEA panels. Commissioners agreed to defer the item for 30 days and requested additional materials and a police presentation on recommendations and assessment findings.
The DeKalb County Board of Commissioners discussed a resolution to establish a permanent community advisory board for the DeKalb County Police Department. Commissioners and police leaders debated the scope and purpose of such a board and asked for more information before proceeding; the committee voted to defer the item for 30 days.
The resolution presented would direct the county law department and the police department to draft a proposed structure, membership criteria and operational guidelines for a civilian advisory board and return to the board of commissioners with an implementation plan.
Arguments and concerns Supporters framed the board as a proactive, ongoing mechanism to strengthen community engagement and sustain the types of citizen feedback provided during periodic CALEA (Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies) certification reviews. Commissioner supporters said a standing board could help implement and sustain community requests — for example, community outreach events — and help maintain trust.
Opponents and police leadership urged caution in establishing a permanent board without clearly defining its purpose and scope. Police representatives said many CALEA civilian panels are time-limited and linked to the accreditation process and warned that a standing board could be misread as signaling a problem where none exists. Police leaders said the department already has regular precinct-level community engagement and accessibility through precinct commanders, public meetings and other ongoing activities.
Requested follow-up and direction Commissioners asked the police department to return with a concise summary of assessment recommendations (the presentation referenced findings from an external assessment described in the meeting as “M and J” or similar) and to explain how a standing advisory board would interact with existing practices. The board voted to defer consideration for 30 days to allow the law department and police to draft more specific language and bring back an implementation plan for approval.
Vote and next steps A motion to defer item 0390 for 30 days carried by voice vote. The committee instructed police and the law department to prepare a proposed structure and to present assessment recommendations and implementation details at the return meeting.
Ending: The board did not adopt the advisory-board structure at this meeting; commissioners asked for additional information and a police presentation before any final vote.
