Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wetland Line Peer Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission deadlocks on 19 Captains Way; no final approval after peer-review and 25‑foot policy debate
Summary
After extended debate and motions both to deny and to approve with additional mitigation, the Conservation Commission recorded ties and did not adopt a final decision on a proposed house at 19 Captains Way. The commission directed a peer review of the wetland line but the project outcome remained unresolved at the meeting.
The Town of Lakeville Conservation Commission reached an impasse July 22 on a proposal for a house at 19 Captains Way after lengthy discussion over the accuracy of the wetland line and a longstanding, informal 25‑foot “no touch” practice.
Representatives for the applicant offered additional mitigation — reinforced erosion controls, roof drains, infiltration trenches and post‑construction stabilization such as sod or geogrid — and said they were willing to provide those measures voluntarily. Commissioners said they remain focused on jurisdictional limits and whether the wetland line is accurate.
The commission agreed to a peer review of the wetland delineation. A motion to deny the project based on the commission’s 25‑foot no‑touch practice resulted in a roll‑call tie and did not carry. A later motion to approve the project with the applicant’s proposed drainage and erosion‑control measures (and a peer review of the wetland line) likewise failed to carry after roll‑call voting produced no decisive majority. Commissioners discussed that a failure to adopt a motion could allow the applicant to seek review by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).
Commission members noted historical flooding photos from May 2010 and expressed concern about flood elevations and the potential for the house to be within the practical floodplain if the wetland line is incorrect. The commission directed that the wetland line be subject to an independent peer review by an engineer or wetland scientist; the peer‑review results will be considered at a future meeting.
Because the commission did not adopt a final decision at the July 22 meeting, the applicant was advised of options including revising the plan, seeking to reopen the matter at a later meeting, or appealing to DEP for a superseding order.
