Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Idaho Falls council discusses one‑time funds, reserves to avert library program cuts
Summary
At an Idaho Falls City Council work session, council members and library director Robert Wright discussed using library reserves and a proposed $50,000 one‑time contribution from city undesignated funds to preserve community programs while a sustainability work group develops a longer‑term funding plan.
At an Idaho Falls City Council work session, councilors and library officials spent an extended portion of the meeting debating how to cover a shortfall in the library’s operating budget without permanently increasing ongoing city support.
Councilor Jim Francis proposed using $50,000 from undesignated, one‑time general‑fund dollars to help the library maintain community programs in fiscal 2026 while a joint council–library work group drafts a sustainable funding plan. "The whole key to anything I want to do here is a long term sustainability plan," Francis said, urging a work group of council and library board representatives.
Library Director Robert Wright described staffing and program trade‑offs the library has already made. "If the council does not have a commitment to increase library funding in the future, one‑time money just doesn't really do anything," Wright said, adding that the library has already eliminated about 10.5 full‑time equivalent positions to reduce costs.
Councilors and staff clarified the library's financial position: the city has budgeted operational expenditure authority that exceeds the library's projected revenues, leaving the board able to draw down an estimated fund balance of roughly $3 million if needed. Council discussion referenced specific undesignated amounts in the general fund: $119,000 of ongoing money, $50,000 from a bond closeout estimate, and $235,000 from a power repayment estimate (totaling about $285,433) that could be used for one‑time needs.
Multiple council members expressed support for forming a work group that would include council liaisons, library board members and staff to develop a long‑term plan. Council members repeatedly cautioned that using one‑time funds cannot replace a commitment to ongoing funding and emphasized the need for clear decisions about spending authority. No formal binding vote to transfer $50,000 or to obligate library reserves was recorded during the session; councilors indicated they would finalize decisions at the formal budget vote scheduled for the council's regular meeting.
The council directed staff to continue preparing final budget materials for the Thursday meeting and to provide the information the work group will need to begin drafting sustainability options. The library board was expected to meet (as noted in the session) and finalize its own internal choices about reserves and programming before the council’s final budget action.
