Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the City Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lynnwood council schedules special Aug. 13 meeting to discuss budget shortfall after 6-1 vote

5559922 · August 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following public concerns and internal budget briefings, the Lynnwood City Council voted 6-1 to hold a special meeting on Aug. 13 to discuss the city—udget shortfall and expenditure reductions; one member voted no citing schedule conflict.

The Lynnwood City Council voted 6-1 on Aug. 11 to hold a special meeting on Wednesday, Aug. 13 from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. to discuss the city—udget shortfall for fiscal 2025-26.

Council member Hurst moved the special meeting, arguing the council needs to examine expenditure reductions and other options now rather than waiting until later in the fall. "I believe that this council in August looking into options that we have ... is a mistake, and we'll just draw this, crisis out," Hurst said, urging timely discussion. (Transcript quote condensed for clarity.)

The vote: The roll call was 6 yes, 1 no (Vice President Bridal/Vinda stated he could not attend and voted no). City Clerk Lonnie and staff noted notice requirements and live-streaming logistics; the city must provide written notice to council and post an agenda more than 24 hours prior to a special meeting.

Context and urgency: Council members said the city finance director has warned that the city's credit rating and bonding capacity could be at risk if the shortfall is not addressed. Hurst said he has repeatedly requested details on specific expenditure reductions and had received none; Assistant City Administrator Moore told the council the administration is negotiating workforce-reduction steps with collective bargaining units and that those discussions limit how much detail staff can release immediately.

Process and logistics: City Clerk Lonnie advised the council that special meetings require a narrowly posted agenda and that staff must avoid taking final action on items outside the published agenda. The council discussed live-streaming accommodations; staff noted the city's streaming contractor requires notice (48 hours preferred) though short-notice accommodations may be possible.

Outcome and next steps: With the motion approved, staff will post the meeting notice and the council will continue deliberations on expenditure reductions, potential revenue options and staffing changes. Several council members urged broad participation and live-stream availability to maintain public transparency.

Ending: The council adjourned after scheduling the special meeting; members said they expect staff to provide more detailed expenditure-reduction information at or before the Aug. 13 discussion.