Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lafco Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council backs AB 2838 with amendment to protect local detachment review
Summary
The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously April 4 to support AB 2838 with a requested amendment aimed at preserving the city’s ability to press its concerns in detachment proceedings, while noting that large jurisdictions such as Los Angeles are largely exempt from other changes proposed in the bill.
The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously April 4 to approve committee recommendations to support Assembly Bill 2838 — legislation aimed at updating Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) procedures statewide — while asking the author to amend the bill to preserve certain city-level protections in detachment proceedings.
Council member Mysakowski said staff and a council working group recommended support of the bill “with concern about future amendments” and that the council would monitor amendments as the measure moved to the state senate. Staff member Deaton and other council members explained that the bill comes from a statewide working group that sought greater uniformity in LAFCO practices but exempts several large counties and cities, including Los Angeles.
The bill would standardize some LAFCO membership and financing arrangements across the state but, according to city staff, would not alter the special reorganization process used for large-scale secession efforts such as the San Fernando Valley and Harbor-area proposals. Council members repeatedly sought clarity about the difference between a “detachment” (a small area leaving a city to join another jurisdiction or the county) and a “special reorganization” (a larger, multi-step process that can result in forming a new city and requires petitions, financial review and dual elections).
Council discussion centered on preserving the city’s existing ability to oppose or otherwise object to small-area detachments. Council member Savornich said AB 2838, as written, would remove a city’s option to unilaterally terminate detachment proceedings and would instead instruct LAFCO to “consider a city’s concerns with great weight,” language the city argued carries no enforceable legal force. Staff and several council members sought an amendment to preserve the city’s current protections for detachment proceedings.
City staff noted that the bill’s sponsors and the statewide working group had carved out explicit exemptions for several major metropolitan LAFCOs, and that the author had been receptive to clarifying amendments. Council members asked that the committee report and instructions to the author clearly record the city’s requested clarifications.
The council approved the committee recommendation by voice and roll call—recorded as 11 ayes—without any recorded dissent. The council instructed staff and the mayor’s legislative liaisons to monitor amendments as AB 2838 moved through the legislature.
The council’s action was procedural: it directed the city’s representatives to pursue changes and monitor the bill rather than adopting local ordinance changes. The measure’s language and any final amendment would determine whether the city’s current detachment protections are preserved in state law.
A related staff working group including council and mayoral office representatives will continue to follow the bill’s progress and recommend specific amendments for the council to consider.
