Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs staff to explore digital-sign rules; forms ad hoc committee to draft parameters
Summary
Following staff presentation and public input, the Loomis council agreed in principle to allow limited electronic message displays and created an ad hoc committee (two council members) to work with staff on ordinance parameters and design guidelines.
Town planning staff presented options for amending Loomis’s sign ordinance to allow electronic/digital message displays. The current municipal code does not permit electronic message display signs; staff provided examples from nearby jurisdictions, sample language, and design options varying from small monument-style inserts to large freeway billboards.
Staff framed the key questions: should Loomis allow digital signs at all; what purposes should they serve (public safety messages, government notices, school communications, commercial advertising); where should they be allowed (town-owned properties, right-of-way, commercial zones, freeways); and what technical limits should apply (size, brightness, animation and image-change interval).
Council discussion: Council members said they were generally open to permitting limited electronic signs but emphasized tight controls. There was broad support for allowing non-commercial informational uses—public safety notices, town-sponsored events and school messaging—and for limiting animation, brightness and proximity to residences. Several members and residents suggested monument-style signs that incorporate an LED or digital insert—rather than full LED billboards—to preserve Loomis’s downtown aesthetic.
Public comment: Residents and local designers urged the council to allow informational signs for public-safety messaging and event notices while restricting animated or flashing content and careful sizing. Fire and public-safety speakers said a digital sign would allow timely warnings (for example, evacuations, red-flag warnings) that can be updated immediately.
Ad hoc committee: Council members Amanda (surname not specified in the transcript excerpt) and Jan (surname not specified) volunteered to serve on an ad hoc committee to work with staff on specifics including allowed locations, permitted content, brightness controls, change intervals and design standards compatible with Loomis’s visual character. Staff said the ad hoc would return proposed ordinance text and standards to the council for formal action.
Next steps: Staff will schedule a future agenda item to formally create the ad hoc group and identify the committee’s scope; staff recommended beginning with a narrow allowance for town-owned, school and public-safety signage and then evaluating whether rules for commercial uses are appropriate later. Planning staff noted that any code amendment would follow the usual public-notice, planning commission and council adoption process.
Quotations come from the staff presentation and public comment. Staff summarized technical options and said sign technology ranges from simple text-only LED inserts to full-color, high-definition displays; staff recommended controls for brightness, animation and change intervals to limit driver distraction and preserve neighborhood quality.
