Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hennepin County advances resolution pushing Minneapolis to speed 0‑waste actions; progress motion moved to full board
Summary
After extended debate, Hennepin County commissioners voted to advance an amended resolution (R2) asking Minneapolis to set targets, report baseline recycling and organics rates, and identify resources to accelerate implementation of the county’s 0‑waste goals. The item was progressed to the Sept. 9 board meeting.
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hennepin County commissioners on Aug. 19 voted to progress a county administration resolution (R2) that directs the City of Minneapolis to set targets, report baseline recycling and organics capture rates and compliance measures, and identify resources and timelines to accelerate implementation of county and city 0‑waste goals.
Lisa Cerny, assistant county administrator for Public Works, told the Administration, Operations and Budget Committee the R2 responds to “ongoing conversations with Hennepin County cities, especially the City of Minneapolis” and aims to increase accountability so local and county goals — including a county vision defined in 2021 and the county’s 2023 0‑waste action plan — can be met. “This resolution is compliant with state statutes and our solid waste management plan,” Cerny said.
The nut graf: commissioners debated whether the R2 strikes the right balance between seeking city accountability and providing collaborative support. Supporters said the county needs specific data to design targeted programs; critics said the R2 is either insufficiently urgent or too narrowly focused on Minneapolis and does not address countywide effects, including potential changes in where trash would be routed if Minneapolis reduces deliveries to HERC.
Supporters argued the October 20, 2025 reporting deadline in the R2 will allow county and city leaders to use budget cycles to align resources. Cerny described the R2’s requirements: Minneapolis must report baseline recycling rates for residential curbside, commercial/institutional/multifamily sectors and overall 2024 recycling rates; report compliance rates on two existing ordinances (the “Green to Go” and commercial building recycling ordinances) or, if data are not available, “report on the necessary steps” to collect it; set annual recycling rate targets through 2030 and material‑type capture targets; and establish a date to initiate the statutory process for organized commercial, institutional and multifamily collection. The R2 as amended also narrows scope in response to city feedback and offers collaborative support from the county.
Opponents and questioners raised multiple concerns. Commissioner Conley cited a city letter saying ending Minneapolis’ HERC contract or eliminating access to HERC could raise disposal costs and shift disposal outside the county, potentially increasing resident fees. Conley also questioned whether “increasing participation” is the right emphasis after county briefings that found participation is high but correct sorting is low. Commissioner Lundy warned the focus on Minneapolis could shift burdens onto suburbs and asked whether regional transfer and sorting facilities would be planned and funded. Commissioner Fernando said he opposes additional landfilling and urged certainty that curbside trash services would continue without disruption.
Commissioner Connolly, who supported progressing the item, said Minneapolis produces a large share of material delivered to HERC and so the R2’s focus is justified. Connolly expressed support for the October 20 deadline for reporting, but objected to one R2 bullet that would delay evaluating mandatory organics participation for city service properties until 2040, saying the evaluation should start far sooner.
County staff emphasized past county actions seeking city compliance: staff noted previous county board resolutions in 2011 and 2014 asking Minneapolis to implement single‑sort recycling and organics recycling, respectively. Cerny and other staff also outlined county investments since 2021: an increase in the waste reduction and recycling budget by “over $5,000,000,” authorization of nine additional FTEs, strengthened ordinance 13 to include organics and recycling requirements, and county funding and technical assistance for city programs. Cerny said the county provided Minneapolis about $1.7 million in SCORE funding in 2024, including $215,000 for multifamily recycling and $150,000 to support organics processing, and made $1.3 million in countywide grant funding available for schools, businesses, multifamily properties and community groups.
After discussion, commissioners voted to progress the resolution to the full board meeting on Sept. 9, where it will be ratified or amended. The progress motion was moved on the record and carried; the committee did not record a roll‑call tally in the transcript.
The ending: the R2 will return to the board for ratification, and staff said they expect the October 20 reporting date to inform budget conversations and potential follow‑up actions.

