Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Nonprofit Tax Exemption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hechoka Retreat Center speakers urge Burke County to resolve tax-exemption and valuation dispute

5448119 · July 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Several public commenters asked the county to grant tax-exempt status or correct property valuation for Hachoka (Hechoka) Retreat Center, said the nonprofit serves veterans and people with mental-health or housing needs, and reported a pending lawsuit over county tax treatment.

Multiple speakers during the informal public-comment period urged Burke County commissioners to resolve a multi-year dispute over tax-exempt status and property valuation for Hechoka (also spelled Hachoka in testimony) Retreat Center, an equine-therapy nonprofit.

Cindy Brown, a paramedic and hospice worker, said the center provides equine therapy to first responders, veterans and clinicians and helps “reset the nervous system” for people who have experienced trauma. Joseph Tate, a volunteer and board member, described Hachoka as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit serving people with mental-health needs, developmental challenges and houseless residents; he asked the county to validate the center’s federal nonprofit status and address an “incorrect property value assessment.”

Marsha Love and Kimberly Clark, both board members associated with Hachoka, told commissioners the county assessed farm equipment and basic items at values they say do not reflect the nonprofit use and that the county had not responded to written requests; Clark said the nonprofit had retained counsel and filed suit to compel county action. Clark asked when the county would respond and said the organization wants the dispute resolved without prolonged litigation.

County officials told Clark the matter has been routed to county counsel and that the county will continue to engage the nonprofit’s attorney as the legal process continues; the county did not take immediate action from the dais.

Provenance: Public-comment remarks appear during the meeting’s informal public‑comment agenda item; speakers identified themselves and summarized the nonprofit’s services and pending legal dispute in the transcript.