Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors oppose proposed RV/boat storage near NW Tenth; planning commission recommends limited approval
Summary
Developers won a planning commission recommendation for SPUD 17-46 (automotive/equipment storage) after agreeing to added landscaping, opaque screening and hours limits. Neighbors objected to noise, light, drainage and property‑value risks and urged denial or major changes.
Oklahoma City — The Planning Commission recommended approval of SPUD 17-46, a proposal to allow automotive and equipment storage (primarily RVs and boats) at 10203 Northwest Tenth Street, after the applicant accepted several conditions intended to reduce visual, noise and drainage impacts on nearby residential properties.
The applicant’s representative, Adam Johnson of Johnson & Associates, told the commission the design proposes covered storage units, landscape buffering and opaque screening along residential edges. He also asked the commission to permit finished metal panels on the rear of the storage units and requested a 150‑foot driveway spacing rather than 200 feet.
Neighbors lodged strong objections during the public comment period. Perry Poling — who said he has lived in the neighborhood for 58 years — told the commission, “Northwest Tenth Street is a 45 mile‑per‑hour street, but it's like the Indy 500,” and asked the panel to deny the rezoning. Resident Ryan Hicks, whose backyard would abut the site, said he feared drainage impacts and root damage to his septic if trees were planted too close to lot lines, and that steel fencing and rows of storage would “feel like I'm in the prison yard.”
In response, the applicant agreed to several written conditions that the commission read into the record: a 25‑foot landscaped buffer along Northwest Tenth with additional screening facing adjacent residences; covered roofing and metal back panels on any units that face the SPUD boundary; limits on operating hours for active access to stored vehicles (8 a.m. to 8 p.m. proposed); and a requirement that no inoperable vehicles be stored forward of the building line. The commission also accepted technical edits limiting visible metal facades and clarifying that parking requirements would be adjusted for the storage‑use configuration.
After deliberation commissioners concluded that, with the added conditions, the storage facility posed fewer negative impacts than many other commercial uses that could occupy the site. The commission’s recommendation will go to city council, where neighbors may seek further conditions or denial. The commission recorded its recommendation for approval with the new conditions; the applicant must still obtain building permits and demonstrate compliance with drainage and site‑plan standards during the permit review process.
The vote to recommend approval was recorded in the meeting as a positive recommendation to city council (recorded ayes/noes available in meeting minutes).
