Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Construction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners award rehab bid for county-owned former church to Temple & Temple contingent on opioid-settlement appropriation
Summary
After reviewing bids, commissioners voted to award the rehabilitation bid for the county-owned former church at 01:10 S. Second Street to Temple & Temple for $324,500, contingent on adopting an ordinance to allow use of restricted opioid-settlement funds and on council appropriation of those funds.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Construction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scott County commissioners reviewed bids for rehab work on the county-owned former church at 110 S. Second Street (the county's community building). Bids were opened in an earlier meeting and several contractors submitted proposals; commissioners discussed whether late submissions or post-bid clarifications (such as adding a concrete floor) could be considered.
Counsel reminded the board that bidding law limits amendments after bid opening and that the county cannot accept after-the-fact modifications to bids; commissioners may reject all bids and re-advertise if they want different specifications. Commissioners compared the lowest bid (Temple & Temple) with another bid that included concrete floors and new windows; the higher bid included an explicit $10,000 allowance for window rehab and a concrete floor that accounted for part of the difference.
Commissioners moved to award the bid to Temple & Temple for $324,500, contingent on a separate ordinance authorizing use of restricted opioid-settlement funds and on the county council approving an additional appropriation from that restricted fund. The motion included direction that staff advertise the appropriation request so council can act; if council approves the appropriation, the county will proceed with the award.
Commissioners discussed process clarity for late or amended bids and asked staff to confirm statutory advertising and bid-acceptance requirements moving forward. No contractor was allowed to change a bid after close of bids; staff noted that rejecting and re-advertising would be the remedy if the county wanted materially different specifications.

