Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents, speakers urge St. Francis Area Schools to review special‑education referral process
Summary
Multiple public commenters at a St. Francis Area Schools board meeting said families are struggling to obtain special‑education services and asked the district to review referral and intervention steps; a district staff member offered to have James Carpenter follow up with parents who provide names.
Multiple parents and community members told the St. Francis Area Schools board that families are encountering obstacles getting students evaluated for and placed on special‑education plans, prompting staff to offer follow‑up outreach.
Speakers asked the board to examine the district’s referral steps and consider collaboration with neighboring districts to improve access and keep families enrolled locally.
At a public‑comment period during the board meeting, one parent who identified herself with the Parents for the Freedom to Read community said, "I've had parents come tell me their struggles with the special ed program." She said the concerns clustered around one attendance area, citing “6 or 7 friends at Cedar Creek” whose children faced difficulty getting services and that four of those parents had independently reported struggles.
Another speaker, introduced as Dr. Rhiannon, described a personal case: "I've been trying to get him on an IEP or a 504. Neither of which we have been successful to this point." She described a son with autism, anxiety and sensory‑processing issues who has received input from multiple outside providers and said she and other caregivers had repeatedly been turned away during attempts to secure formal school‑based services.
A district staff member explained the usual process to parents: referrals begin with site student intervention teams that recommend classroom interventions for about six weeks before a formal special‑education referral is considered. The staff member said the concerns described by parents appeared to relate to the pre‑referral process. The staff member offered to have "James Carpenter reach out and find out some additional information" if parents would provide names and grade levels so staff could determine where a child is in the process.
Board members did not take formal action on the topic during the meeting; staff framed the next steps as outreach and information gathering rather than an immediate policy change.
The public commenters asked the board to consider whether district sites have consistent screening and referral practices and whether district staff could pursue interdistrict collaboration to share special‑education practices. The parent narrator suggested parents sometimes open‑enroll to other districts because they believe those districts provide stronger special‑education supports.
District officials encouraged parents who want follow‑up to contact the district office with student names and grade levels so staff can trace a student's status in the intervention/referral timeline.
The board did not set a date for additional discussion or a formal study; staff indicated outreach and case‑level follow‑up would be the immediate next step.
