Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates urban revitalization incentives as members raise concerns about apartment growth
Summary
Councilors reviewed the history of Le Mars' urban revitalization incentives and debated whether the city should slow incentives for multi-family apartments and shift incentives toward single-family housing; no final ordinance change was recorded in the excerpt.
Councilors discussed the Le Mars Urban Revitalization Area and current incentive structure, with several members expressing concern that recent incentives may have favored multi-family apartment construction.
Staff recounted the history presented in the packet: the urban revitalization area was established on March 6, 2012; an April 5, 2016 amendment provided multi-residential property a seven-year exemption on 100% of added value and commercial property a three-year exemption on 100% of added value; and a Dec. 3, 2024 amendment was noted in the packet as relating to section 404.3(d) of the Iowa Code (the packet text in the transcript did not fully specify the effect of that amendment). The transcript indicates earlier incentives included an exemption for residential property on the first $75,000 of actual value for five years, as originally adopted.
Several council members said residents have told them the city appears to be seeing a large number of apartment projects and that the council should consider incentivizing single-family housing more heavily or pausing apartment incentives while the city monitors how current projects fill. One councilmember who said they served on the council when many of the incentives were set cautioned that council decisions should move forward collectively. Staff member Mark was credited with preparing background research and comparing surrounding communities’ approaches.
The excerpted discussion did not record a motion or vote to change the current incentives; it reflects a policy-level conversation and a councilmember request to evaluate whether incentives for multi-family housing should be reduced in favor of single-family incentives.
