Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Billing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears sewer clean-out complaints, discusses utility billing proration issues
Summary
Councilmembers and staff discussed sewer clean-out work that some residents said caused plumbing problems and reviewed complaints about a 43-day billing cycle and proration that increased some utility bills; staff described notification practices and possible timing changes for future rate implementations.
Councilmembers raised resident complaints about sewer clean-out work that, according to some attendees, led to damage to household plumbing and asked how residents are notified before contractors perform the work.
City staff explained that sewer clean-out work is typically performed by a subcontractor working within a general area and that providing a precise day-and-time notice to each household is often impractical. The staff member noted the city sends notices for water-main flushing and posts notices on city sites; work on sewer projects is described as harder to schedule precisely and therefore more difficult to notify individually.
Separately, councilmembers reviewed multiple resident calls about recent utility bills that covered an extended (43-day) billing period. A staff member who reviewed one account said the way proration interacts with the billing schedule and meter reads can create an extra billing period for some customers. The staff explanation included these points: if meter readings and proration are applied in a certain way, a customer can appear to be billed an extra minimum for a calendar year; the city used a cutoff date (May 22 in this rollout) to verify account rollovers; and delaying a rate increase until the next billing cycle could be a way to avoid similar complaints when rates change in future years.
Why it matters: Councilmembers said residents view the extra charges as unfair. Staff described the technical constraints of the billing software and meter-reading schedule that produced the extended billing period and said the city looked into account-level proration but did not find a practical, universal fix for the immediate rollover. The staff suggested potential process changes for future rate increases to reduce customer confusion.
Notable quotes: A councilmember summarized a resident's complaint: “I paid a monthly minimum on 17 days even though I paid for the whole month.” A staff member described the situation as being between “a rock and a hard place” when explaining tradeoffs in the billing transition.
Next steps: Staff and councilmembers discussed possible future adjustments to timing of rate increases or billing-cycle handling to mitigate proration issues; no binding decision or formal motion on billing or sewer notification procedures was recorded at the meeting.
