Commission weighs safety‑focused limits for political signs and digital signage while staff researches legal constraints

Commissioners discussed a referral to review Chapter 153 of the city code on signs. The conversation covered three distinct issues: temporary political signs (especially around City Hall during elections), static sign size and setbacks, and the regulation of LED or digital message signs.

For temporary political signage, commissioners proposed safety‑based location limits (examples discussed included a 10‑foot setback from the roadway edge at City Hall and limited areas where signs may be placed) rather than a broad numeric prohibition. One commissioner suggested limiting the number of signs in the City Hall area to make enforcement manageable, noting enforcement resources are limited and crews sometimes remove and re‑post signs as they respond to complaints.

On digital and LED signage, commissioners raised concerns about brightness and message motion. Attendees suggested researching measurable brightness limits, limits on scrolling or rapidly changing text, and rules that prevent signs from producing distracting, flashing displays (police and fire lights were referenced as an example of potentially blinding lighting). Discussion included a reference to an existing large “keyhole” sign form and questions about maximum permitted heights and setbacks in current code.

Commissioners emphasized that any restriction must be legally defensible with regard to First Amendment limits on political speech. The group asked staff to compare approaches other cities use, verify what is legally permissible, and return recommendations that prioritize safety, enforceability and constitutional constraints. No ordinance amendments were adopted at the meeting.