Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Text Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission postpones vote on yard ground-cover text amendment to October
Summary
The Battle Creek City Planning Commission voted July 23 to postpone consideration of text amendment R1-25, which would require residential yards to have living or natural ground cover, until the October planning commission meeting.
The Battle Creek City Planning Commission voted July 23 to postpone consideration of text amendment R1-25, which would amend Section 12.62.02 of the zoning ordinance to require yards in residential districts to be improved with natural or living ground cover, until the October planning commission meeting.
Planning staff explained the amendment would remove an existing exclusion that exempts single-family and two-family residential properties from the ordinance’s ground-cover requirement. "The purpose of the amendment is simply to remove that reference to other than single or 2 family residential to ensure that throughout residential zoning districts, you're going to see typical ground cover like you would expect to see on residential properties," a staff member said.
Commissioners raised questions about enforcement and the scope of the change. One commissioner said cultural differences and neighborhood circumstances mean some outreach is necessary before imposing new requirements, citing a neighborhood where residents had purchased sod together and a Burmese organization that had expressed concern about perceived misunderstandings. Another commissioner said the ordinance text and enforcement procedures accomplish different goals and recommended staff return with clearer linkage between the regulatory text and enforcement practice.
The commission moved to postpone the item to the October planning commission meeting and asked city staff to engage neighborhood planning councils and provide additional detail on both the ordinance language and how enforcement would be handled. The motion was supported by the mayor and carried on a recorded voice vote. Commissioner White, Commissioner Denison, Commissioner Morris and Mayor Behnke voted yes; the motion passed.
Staff and commissioners indicated the postponement is intended to allow time for outreach and for staff to prepare more specific language and enforcement options before the commission takes a formal vote.
