Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Decisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Board approves consent agenda, canvass, appointments, contracts and personnel items
Summary
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on multiple consent blocks, the congressional canvass, an intergovernmental agreement, an appointment and several personnel and settlement items. Key motions and outcomes are listed below.
At the meeting the Board of Supervisors disposed of a large set of consent and statutory items with unanimous voice votes and approved several individual actions after presentations.
Key outcomes (motions carried unanimously unless noted):
- Planning and zoning consent items 6–16: Approved (motion carried 4–0). - Consent block items 18–101: Approved (motion carried 4–0). - Statutory hearing item 17a (road file A0749): Motion to approve carried unanimously. - Item 102: Canvas of returns for the July 15 Special Congressional District 7 primary election: Approved (see separate election article for details). - Item 103: Intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Flood Control District: Approved. - Item 104: Appointment of Luke Thompson as constable for the East Mesa Justice Precinct: Approved; nomination by Vice Chair Brophy McGee and second by Supervisor Stewart; vote unanimous. - Items 105–114: County Attorney settlements and chief-deputy salary requests (includes chief deputy county superintendent and chief deputy county sheriff salary items): Approved (motion to approve items 105–114 carried unanimously). - Improvement district items 115–116 (paving improvement resolution and call for sealed bids): Approved. - Flood Control District items 117–125 (IGAs, personnel, property actions): Approved. - Library District items 126–127 (personnel agenda and minutes): Approved; the board then adjourned as the Library District Board of Directors. - Stadium District items 128–129 (annual audit and minutes): Approved.
Where a recorded roll call was not required, the board used voice votes; the clerk noted unanimous support where the outcome was recorded as “motion carries unanimously.”
