Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Permitting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Saline County tables new oversize and overweight load permit policy for ag exemptions and annual-permit language

5600789 · August 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County engineer presented a consolidated oversize/overweight load permit policy; commissioners and a public trucker asked staff to add agricultural-equipment exemptions and consider annual permits before adoption.

The Saline County Board of Commissioners on Aug. 19 voted to table a proposed policy establishing comprehensive oversize and overweight load permit requirements so staff can add exemptions for agricultural equipment and consider an annual-permit option.

Justin Mader, Saline County engineer, told the board the draft Policy 2025-101 would consolidate the county’s building-move permits with new requirements for nonbuilding oversized and overweight loads and would repeal an older 2003 resolution. The policy defines oversize and overweight dimensions and weights consistent with state statutes, adds insurance and traffic-control requirements, and sets a $40 permit fee (the statutory maximum).

Mader said the policy draws from state statutes and clarifies definitions for the county, listing width over 8.5 feet, height over 14 feet, trailer length and axle-weight thresholds as the triggers for permitting. He told the board the policy also outlines required steps when a move requires removal of traffic signs, mailboxes or vegetation.

Concerns raised and why it was tabled

- Agricultural equipment: Mader acknowledged the draft did not include specific agricultural exemptions and recommended adding them. Several commissioners and a public commenter, Tony Johnson of Salina (who identified himself as a trucker), said typical farm moves should be exempt or handled via a simpler annual permit.

- Single-trip versus annual permits: Public comment asked whether contractors moving equipment multiple times a year would need to purchase a permit for each trip; Mader said the statutes allow for annual permits but the administration needs clearer language to provide notification and oversight for moves. The board asked staff to add annual-permit language to reduce friction for frequent local haulers.

- Enforcement and notification: Commenters asked who will enforce permit requirements and how the county will ensure haulers notify the county in advance. Mader said the permit requires haulers to call the road and bridge office a day or two before moving so staff can advise on road conditions and reduce conflicts.

Next steps: Commissioner Weese moved to table Resolution 25-2433 and directed staff to add agricultural exemptions and consider annual permits; the board approved the motion. Mader said staff will revise the policy and return it for consideration at a future meeting.