Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Trips topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears plan for student trip to Italy and Greece; cost estimated about $5,000 per student

5585682 · August 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposed Lenoir City Schools overseas trip for late May–early June was presented to the board with an estimated student cost of about $5,000 and existing district safety procedures applied; the presentation asked the board to affirm planning, with fundraising timeline noted.

Lenoir City Schools staff presented preliminary plans for a proposed student trip to Italy and Greece during a May 27–June 5 time frame, saying the estimated cost per student is roughly $5,000 and that district safety procedures used on prior trips would again apply.

Mr. Fass, who presented the proposal, said arrangements mirror last year’s trip (which went to France and England) and that the district expects a shorter fundraising turnaround for students this year. “Roughly the same cost around $5,000 for students,” Mr. Fass said. He described the district’s safety policy and said that the previous year’s trip “went down a hitch,” adding that parents and students represented the school well.

Why it matters: Board approval or acknowledgment of international trips affects district liability, fundraising timelines and planning for chaperones, student eligibility and safety oversight. The presentation was an informational kickoff so staff can begin planning and publicize fundraising timelines.

Fundraising and timing: Presenters said there is about a year between the presentation and the proposed travel dates for students to raise funds; this year’s schedule provides a shorter turnaround compared with the prior cycle, and staff committed to returning with formal paperwork and details.

No formal vote to finalize the trip was recorded in the transcript. The presenter asked the board to “kick off” planning and to affirm that staff should proceed with logistics; the board did not record a motion or vote during the presentation in the provided transcript.

Other details: Presenters noted that safety procedures used on prior trips would be followed and that staff would supply formal trip packets and paperwork to the board before final approval or authorization steps.

The board’s routine approvals later in the meeting covered other items; the trip presentation was presented as an informational item to begin planning.