Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Engineering estimate puts Orderville park project near $6.2 million; committee to prioritize phases

5562613 · August 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A civil engineering estimate returned to the board places the Orderville Town Park project at roughly $6.2 million across four phases; board members identified major cost drivers (site excavation, parking, equipment) and instructed the rec committee to meet and prioritize scope and funding options.

Town staff presented a civil engineering cost estimate for the proposed Orderville Town Park that totals about $6.2 million across four phases. Board members described the figures as “sticker shock” and identified two primary cost drivers: site/dirt work and parking-land acquisition.

Brianna summarized the consultant’s estimate and said elements in the consultant report include a new field, upgrades to the existing field, concession and restroom facilities, a pavilion, a toddler playground, three parking areas, and significant site excavation and restoration work. The estimate lists roughly $1.17 million for major excavation work (board discussion referenced “a million $170,000” in excavation costs) and engineering contingencies that include purchasing a parcel for additional parking.

Committee members said phase 1—partially funded by a $200,000 recreation grant and an expected $500,000 total for that early phase—remains subject to refinement. Board members noted equipment totals and site-equipment line items: “Equipment that Courtney has included ... you're looking at $1,200,000,” a board member said, referring to equipment costs across phases. Staff reported the committee is about $670,000 short on dirt-work funding as currently scoped. The board did not take any funding votes at the meeting; members instructed the recreation park committee to reconvene, refine priorities, and return with options for reducing costs and identifying outside funding (county funds, grants, phased scope changes, or volunteer-led work).

Board members flagged risk areas including the need for geotechnical certainty on excavation to avoid future settling, and parking access and ownership for the proposed north-side lot. The park engineering package is public record and staff said committee members will meet before the next board meeting to propose a revised approach.