Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Assigned topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheyenne staff propose case-by-case assigned zoning after Laramie County rewrite
Summary
City planning staff told the Public Services Committee they will move from an automatic county-to-city assigned-zone mapping to a case-by-case analysis after Laramie County rewrote its zoning, and the committee recommended approval to advance the ordinance to the governing body.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Assigned topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planning staff on Oct. 6 told the City of Cheyenne Public Services Committee that the city will change how it assigns city zoning to newly annexed parcels after Laramie County completed a comprehensive zoning rewrite.
Seth Lloyd, a planner with the City of Cheyenne Planning and Development Department, said the county's new LU (land use) designation would, under the city's current practice, often map directly to a city Mixed Use Business (MUB) assigned zone. "That's a pretty intense zone district for assigned zoning purposes," Lloyd said, arguing the city should instead evaluate several local factors and pick a base city zone on a case-by-case basis.
Lloyd described four review factors staff will use: current county-allowed uses at the site, the likelihood a county conditional use would be approved in practice, the existing city zones around the parcel, and the parcel's current use. He also told the committee that applicants would still have the option of filing a rezoning (zone change) if they did not accept the assigned base zone.
Committee members pressed staff on predictability and administration. "What's the downside of this?" asked Dr. Evans. Lloyd acknowledged a loss of predictability: "You might not be certain if you're gonna get AG zoning or MR zoning or CB zoning because it kind of depends on your case by case analysis." He said staff can provide an early recommendation at pre-application meetings to reduce uncertainty and that the change will add some staff workload but should not lengthen the applicant's timeline because annexation already involves statutory notice periods.
Council member Dr. Aldridge said she wanted a "crosswalk" showing how county zones would translate under the new process and said she would vote no at committee if that crosswalk were not produced before the council hearing. Lloyd agreed to produce case-study examples and a comparison for council review.
The committee voted to recommend the ordinance amending assigned zoning language advance to the governing body on second reading. The motion was moved by Councilman White and seconded by Dr. Emmons; the committee's recommendation to advance the change will be placed on the Monday council agenda.
Why it matters: The change alters a longstanding, automatic mapping of county zones to city assigned zones and replaces it with a more discretionary, context-sensitive approach. That could affect what base zoning property owners receive when their land is annexed and may require more early coordination between staff and applicants.
What happens next: Staff will prepare the crosswalk/case-study materials and the proposed ordinance advance through the council process for further public hearings and final action.

