Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hazard Mitigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Salt Lake County MSD presents updated multi‑jurisdiction hazard mitigation plan; council to consider adoption
Summary
Madison Warner of the Municipal Services District outlined a 5‑year update to the countywide hazard mitigation plan, described its structure (volume 1 base plan, volume 2 jurisdiction annexes) and recommended Copperton place formal adoption on a future agenda so the town remains eligible for FEMA mitigation grants.
Madison Warner, municipal planner for the Salt Lake County Municipal Services District (MSD), presented an updated multi‑jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan to the Copperton Town Council and asked the council to review the draft before formally adopting it at a future meeting.
Why it matters: Adopting the plan helps jurisdictions qualify for certain federal mitigation and recovery funding and aligns Copperton with countywide priorities for reducing long‑term hazard risk.
Key points presented
- Plan structure and purpose: The MSD updated the countywide hazard mitigation plan that is revised every five years. Volume 1 is the base plan covering shared countywide hazards; volume 2 contains jurisdiction‑specific annexes. Copperton has its own annex in volume 2 that lists suggested mitigation actions, responsible parties, priorities and potential funding sources.
- Hazard updates and stakeholder input: The updated plan adds and refines hazards such as extreme temperatures, heavy rain, lightning and high winds and incorporates input from stakeholders ranging from elected officials to school districts and the public (the MSD conducted outreach, including an on‑site presence at Town Days and an online survey).
- Grants and FEMA compliance: Warner said the plan satisfies FEMA planning criteria necessary to apply for Stafford Act mitigation grants and other FEMA programs; adoption makes jurisdictions better positioned for cost‑share and recovery funding after an eligible event.
Council process and next steps
Council members asked for an adopting resolution and expressed a preference to review the plan before formal adoption. Council staff and Warner agreed to place a formal adoption item (including a template resolution) on a future meeting agenda for action. Warner said the plan remains a draft until formally adopted and that changes can be made if the council identifies major concerns.
Ending
The council asked staff to place the mitigation plan adoption on the next agenda and to provide the jurisdiction annex and any adopting‑resolution language for review. Warner said she will share the annex and supporting materials and that MSD staff can meet with council members to discuss specific mitigation actions.
