Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Disposition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Benton County supervisors approve sale of former animal shelter after court clears title
Summary
The Benton County Board of Supervisors voted to approve the sale of the former county animal shelter property after a judge’s quiet-title ruling, despite objections from adjacent landowners citing a 1948 deed restriction that — they say — required the land to remain a wildlife refuge.
Get email alerts on the Property Disposition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Benton County Board of Supervisors voted to approve the sale of the county-owned property that formerly housed the animal shelter after a court quiet-title judgment determined the county holds fee simple title free of earlier restraints.
The decision followed public comment from adjacent landowners and estate trustees who said an earlier deed from Ida Edmonds had limited the parcel’s use to a wildlife refuge. "It's never been a wildlife refuge area. It's a silly place to be a wildlife refuge area," said John Elwick, a trustee for the Genent Elwick Estate, during public comment. Elwick and other adjacent landowners urged the board to pursue a land swap or to remove a private water line that crosses their farmland.
The legal background was described to supervisors by David Thompson, the county attorney, who outlined the court proceedings that led to a judgment clearing recorded restraints on the parcel. "The court found in favor ... calling this absolute owner fee simple," Thompson said, summarizing the judgment that, in his words, removed prior covenant claims related to the 1948 deed language.
Why this matters: Trustees and neighbors said the parcel has caused recurring operational and boundary concerns for decades, including agricultural encroachment, trees along field edges and a water line that landowners say runs across their property without an easement. Trustees said earlier conservation-system conversations and proposals (including an offer to swap equal acreage to create a connected trail) were not pursued.
Details from the meeting and record cited at the hearing: - Trustees said a recorded 1949 quick-claim deed from Ida Edmonds to the county included language limiting use to a "permanent wildlife refuge," a restriction trustees told supervisors the county acknowledged but had not enforced. - County staff and the county attorney referenced a subsequent quiet-title case and a marketable-record-title determination the court entered; the county attorney told the board the judgment removes earlier restraints, enabling disposition. - Trustees raised a separate 2002 water-and-sewer easement and a 2002 city resolution showing the parcel’s annexation into the City of Vinton. County counsel noted the water easement language references running a permanent water line and that such easements can "run with the land."
During the meeting supervisors discussed valuation and sale procedures. One commenter cited the parcel’s assessed value at about $97,000 and noted the land portion and building portions on the tax rolls (the transcript lists the land assessment roughly $38,000 and the building about $60,000). Trustees said the county previously pulled the property from sale to obtain a title opinion and later returned it to the market.
Supervisors moved to approve the sale "based on the judge's rulings and everything there," and the board voted to approve the sale. The motion and roll-call vote were called for during the meeting; the transcript does not include a full recorded roll-call tally in the public comment excerpt.
What remains: Trustees said they may bid on the property if it is offered for sale. They asked the county to consider rerouting or removing the private water line and to address trees encroaching on adjacent farmland. County staff said title-clearance and statutory sale procedures will be followed as required under Iowa law before final transfer.
The board also discussed treatment of related small former school parcels elsewhere in the county, noting prior practice of offering them for sale and that some remain to be posted for sale or otherwise disposed.
The public hearing and vote followed presentation of the court judgment and supporting documentary excerpts in the board packet. Supervisors instructed staff to proceed with sale steps consistent with the court order and applicable law.

