Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Private Right Of Action topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning adopts ordinance allowing private suits for code violations after notice
Summary
Orangevilleplanning and zoning approved an ordinance that permits a personally affected party to file a private suit for declaratory or injunctive relief after notifying the city and giving it 60 days to act; the city may, at its discretion, initiate enforcement instead.
Orangevilleplanning and zoning voted to adopt an ordinance formalizing a private right of action for city code violations, restricting suits to declaratory and injunctive relief and requiring a notification and waiting period before a complainant may sue.
City attorney Lisa told the commission the ordinance places the new language in the nuisance section of the municipal code and limits private suits to district court requests for declaratory and injunctive relief only, "No damage claims." She said the measure requires a complainant to notify the city of an alleged code violation and intent to sue, and to wait 60 days for the city to decide whether to initiate enforcement. If the city does not commence enforcement within 60 days, the complainant may file suit and must inform the city within 14 days of filing.
The ordinance was presented as a way to avoid immediate city involvement in private land-use disputes and to give a cooling-off period before litigation. Commissioners and attendees discussed whether the measure simply restates existing practice or changes how the city will respond to neighbor disputes; some speakers said it clarifies the city's discretion to refrain from intervening in civil disputes tied to private property uses.
After discussion the commission called for a motion to adopt the ordinance. A motion and second were made; members voted by voice and the motion carried with ayes recorded and no opposition noted.
The ordinance was recorded in the meeting as "Ordinance 2025-2." The text presented to the commission states the city has no obligation to intervene but retains the right to do so; it also specifies the procedural notice periods and the limits on remedies available to private litigants.
Planning staff and the city attorney said the change was drafted to address recurring private land-use disputes that have prompted residents to seek a formal city response. The commission closed the matter after adoption and continued with its regular agenda.
