Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sb168 Cannabis Amendment Reconsideration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate committee reopens and reaffirms amended cannabis bill after correcting unintended change

2933486 · April 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor voted to reconsider its prior recommendation on Senate Bill 168 and approved the bill as amended after removing an unintended amendment related to pesticide hold orders.

Chair Patricia Pizzina reopened work on Senate Bill 168 on the committee floor after staff and stakeholders identified an unintended amendment in the earlier work session. The committee voted to reconsider its prior motion and then voted to amend and recommend the bill for passage without the erroneously added item. "It was not the intent to add this amendment, and I'm asking for your vote to reconsider our previous action," Chair Pizzina said as she reopened the work session. The motion to reconsider was made by Senator Daly and seconded by Senator Scheibel. After brief discussion the motion carried on a voice vote.

The item at issue was item 3 in the work session document, which would have required the Cannabis Compliance Board to adopt regulations setting forth circumstances for terminating a hold order when alleged use of a pesticide not permitted was at issue. Committee members and stakeholders agreed that the item was added in error. The chair said removing item 3 would "preserve the language as originally drafted." The committee then took a motion to amend and do pass the bill, moved by Senator Scheibel and seconded by Senator Daley. The motion carried on a voice vote; the committee assigned the floor statement to Senator Wynne.

No additional debate or substantive policy changes were recorded on the floor during the reconvened work session; the committee’s action reopened and then replaced its earlier recommendation, restoring the bill’s original language in the section affected by the removed amendment. The committee clerk and staff will file the corrected work session document and the conceptual amendment referenced at the hearing for the legislative record.

The action was procedural: the committee reconsidered a previous recommendation, removed the unintended amendment (item 3) and again recommended SB 168 as amended (without item 3) to the floor. The committee did not adopt new language beyond the correction recorded in the work session document.