Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning commission approves routine plats and rezonings; replat approved
Summary
The commission approved consent items and three routine land-use actions: rezoning of a 5.927-acre site east of Highway 130 to Campus Industrial, rezoning of a 2.509-acre retail site from GB-2 to GB-1, and a replat at The Village at Wells Branch. No members voted against the motions as recorded by voice vote.
The Pflugerville Planning and Zoning Commission approved a group of routine matters and three public-hearing items during the meeting.
Consent agenda: The commission approved the consent agenda in a single motion. The consent items listed by staff were: adoption of the amended 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting schedule; preliminary plat for Wise Kelly Subdivision; and the commission minutes for May 6, 2024. The consent motion carried by voice vote with no recorded opposition.
Rezoning — 3315 East Pecan Street: Planning staff presented a rezoning request for a 5.927-acre site at 3315 East Pecan Street, asking to change zoning from Urban Center Level 5 (UCL5) to Campus Industrial to align with adjacent property. Staff recommended approval, noting Campus Industrial is intended for employment center uses including light industrial, research and development, multi-story offices, business services and limited retail. No public comment was received and the commission approved the rezoning by motion.
Rezoning — Weiss retail center (2.509 acres): Staff presented a request to rezone a 2.509-acre property currently used as a fuel station and retail from General Business 2 (GB-2) to General Business 1 (GB-1); staff recommended approval. The applicant was present but no public comment was recorded. The commission approved the rezoning by motion.
Replat — Village at Wells Branch Section 2, Lot 3B: The commission approved a replat dividing Lot 3B (1.07 acres) into two lots as presented by staff. No members of the public registered to speak on the item.
All three public-hearing actions were approved by motions recorded as "aye" voice votes; the meeting record shows the public hearings were closed and the motions carried with no recorded oppositions.
