Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collective Bargaining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hearing on SB 301: bill would let unclassified state peace officers collectively bargain
Summary
Senate Bill 301 would expand the statutory definition of "employee" for collective bargaining to include category 1, 2 and 3 peace officers in the unclassified state service; supporters said the change corrects an inequity for gaming control agents and other unclassified officers, opponents warned of fiscal and labor-policy consequences.
Sen. Marilyn Dondero Loop presented Senate Bill 301, which would revise Nevada law to allow categories 1, 2 and 3 peace officers who are unclassified state employees to participate in collective bargaining with the Executive Department.
Nut graf: Proponents said SB 301 closes a gap that has left certain unclassified peace officers—such as Gaming Control Board agents—without access to the collective-bargaining rights given to many other peace officers; opponents said expanding bargaining could create fiscal and management complications.
Rick McCann, representing the Nevada Association of Public Safety Officers and the Nevada Law Enforcement Coalition, told the committee the bill adds a sentence to the statutory definition of "employee" for bargaining purposes so that unclassified category 1–3 peace officers are included. "Placing them into collective bargaining will not make them automatically classified employees," McCann said, citing communication with Gaming Control Board staff.
Union and law-enforcement organizations including the Las Vegas Police Protective Association and the Nevada Police Union testified in support. Dan Gordon, president of the Nevada Police Union, said "all peace officers in the state of Nevada, whether it's category 1, 2, or 3, deserve the right to collectively bargain."
Americans for Prosperity testified in opposition, arguing the change could disrupt the existing structure of public-sector collective bargaining, create wage and benefit disparities, and saddle Nevada taxpayers with unsustainable obligations. The organization's deputy state director warned the expansion could set a precedent for other specialized employees to seek similar treatment.
Sponsor Dondero Loop said two fiscal notes for SB 301 came back as zero: from the Department of Industry and the Department of Administration's Human Resource Management. The hearing record shows no committee vote during the hearing.
Ending: After testimony from supporters and a single public-opposition statement, the committee closed the hearing on SB 301 and moved on to other business.
