Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rikers Closure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Independent Rikers Commission tells City Council: ‘Rikers must close’ as agencies and commission disagree on timeline and roles

3805306 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Independent Rikers Commission told the New York City Council that Rikers Island “must close because it is a stain on the soul of our city,” and urged a faster, more coordinated push to replace the complex with borough‑based jails and community care.

The Independent Rikers Commission told the New York City Council on the record that Rikers Island “must close because it is a stain on the soul of our city,” and urged faster action, more treatment beds off‑island and two full‑time mayoral appointees to drive the work.

The commission’s chair, Judge Lippmann, told the Criminal Justice Committee the report lays out “a blueprint to get that done” and said “we must end it and end it now,” citing the high number of deaths and the jail’s role in treating people with serious mental illness. The commission recommended speeding construction of borough‑based jails, creating 500 forensic psychiatric beds outside jails, and appointing an administration point person plus a corrections culture‑change lead to coordinate across city and state agencies.

Why it matters: Council members and witnesses framed Rikers as both a humanitarian and fiscal crisis and pressed city agencies on concrete steps, funding, and accountability. Commissioners said closing Rikers will require sustained leadership, improved case processing, more mental‑health capacity in the community, and changes to Department of Correction (DOC) culture; agency witnesses described progress but disputed the feasibility of closing Rikers within the statutory August 2027 deadline.

Key arguments and agency responses

Judge Lippmann and other commission members said the evidence shows Rikers has become an “accelerator of human misery,” citing racial disparities among staff and incarcerated people and the jail’s de facto role as a psychiatric facility. The commission estimated large annual savings once a reformed borough‑based system is operating and said the city should not seek an extension of the statutory deadline without meeting the commission’s benchmarks.

City agency witnesses — including Diana Logan, director of the Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice (MOCJ) — told the committee that the administration shares the goal of closing Rikers but said the 2027 statutory deadline is no longer achievable because of pandemic‑era delays, construction constraints and other factors. Agency testimony highlighted three ongoing priorities: build humane borough‑based jails, reduce unnecessary incarceration, and expand reentry supports.

The hearing included a technical dispute about the construction timetable. Commission members and some council members argued that design‑build techniques and concurrent site work could shorten construction timelines by up to a year. The Department of Design and Construction (DDC) cautioned that starting foundation work or other construction before final state approvals or a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) would expose the city to substantial change‑order and liability risk.

Commission recommendations on staffing and services

Commission testimony included operational suggestions: an estimated staffing model for a smaller borough‑based system (the commission described a target population roughly capped near 4,500 people), adding 500 psychiatric beds outside jails, and a ratio of about 75 uniformed officers per 100 incarcerated people with roughly 1,500 civilian service staff in a post‑Rikers system. The commission and witnesses said those staffing and bed numbers should be paired with aggressive case processing reforms and investments in housing, treatment and community services.

Accountability, oversight and culture change

The commission repeatedly urged the appointment of two dedicated, full‑time positions — a mayor‑level coordinator to “get to yes” across agencies and a corrections leader focused on culture change and training — arguing that the absence of a single, empowered point person has slowed progress. DOC and CHS (Correctional Health Services) witnesses described ongoing policy reviews, additional training and planned outposted clinical units in city hospitals for people in DOC custody; DOC said state approvals and final punch‑list items remain to be completed for some outposted units.

Public safety, deaths and mental health capacity

Witnesses offered differing counts of deaths and harms at Rikers (the commission cited 62 deaths since 2020; other speakers cited lower but still alarming figures). The commission and public‑safety advocates linked decarceration, improved case processing and housing investments to public‑safety gains, arguing that jails that simply replicate Rikers’ culture in borough locations would undermine reform.

What the hearing did not decide

Council and agency leaders did not pass legislation at the hearing. Multiple bills and resolutions were discussed (see separate articles on specific proposals). No formal votes on closure deadlines or on commission recommendations occurred in the committee during this hearing.

Looking ahead

Council members said they will press for more concrete, itemized updates, including a public tracker of commitments and clear metrics on how many people are being diverted from jail. Agency witnesses agreed to provide more data and to work with council staff on updates to the points‑of‑agreement tracker.

Ending note

The hearing made clear the political and technical dimensions of closing Rikers: the commission urged urgency and a single accountable structure, while the administration urged caution about construction and legal risks, pointing to the need for continued intergovernmental collaboration, funding and oversight.